Goughy
Hall of Fame Member
No. That is allGloucefan said:I thinnk, I'll get slaughtered for this, that if he wasn't wicketkeeper he would be good test standard batsman.
No. That is allGloucefan said:I thinnk, I'll get slaughtered for this, that if he wasn't wicketkeeper he would be good test standard batsman.
I think he is safe. I don't think he has done enough wrong to even be close to losing his place. There is no real natural replacement and he still averages a 100 every 3 tests which is an incredible return (8 from 26) even if he does only average 35.5 in his last 10 tests.Pothas said:Strauss out cheaply again. He has looked quite good in this series but has failed to make a score. Im a real supporter of his but i guess his place really has to be under threat now.
Surely Cook is as natural replacement as you could ask for?Goughy said:I think he is safe. I don't think he has done enough wrong to even be close to losing his place. There is no real natural replacement and he still averages a 100 every 3 tests which is an incredible return (8 from 26) even if he does only average 35.5 in his last 10 tests.
ahem, could I have my last post back?superkingdave said:Surely Cook is as natural replacement as you could ask for?
BoyBrumby said:-Going by his interview Jon Lewis really rates Jon Lewis. Bit of self belief is admirable, but my, how does he tear himself away from the mirror in the mornings?!
Vaughan batted at 4 during 2004 & 2004/5, so the other option is for him to replace Collingwood with KP batting at 5. Whoever drops out can consider himself unlucky though.Armadillo said:If you didn't drop Strauss you would have to drop someone. When Vaughan gets back there won't be enough room for Strauss/Cook.
Maybe I'm being a bit harsh on him, but almost every England cricketer seems to talk of the "Team England" ethos in interviews nowadays, Lewis was all "I never doubted I'd play" & "I think I can take wickets whatever the conditions".Lostman said:i dindnt c the interview what did he say?
Don't get me wrong, I'm all for a healthy respect of one's own abilities; as a kid three of my fav sportsmen were John McEnroe, Marvin Hagler & Daley Thompson who all had self-belief in spades.Goughy said:Regarding Lewis.
I did not see the comments but I do like a bit of swagger in an athlete.
If you do not believe in yourself no-one else will.
Also guys like Lewis and KP did not fit the stereotype of what a test cricketer should be and without extra self-belief they never would have got where they are.
Because he's going to prove himself for the Ashes on a pitch most similar to the one we might encounter in that series?BoyBrumby said:Don't get me wrong, I'm all for a healthy respect of one's own abilities; as a kid three of my fav sportsmen were John McEnroe, Marvin Hagler & Daley Thompson who all had self-belief in spades.
That said, whilst KP knows he's good, he's always careful to give credit to the rest of the team for their contributions. Lewis seemed to me to be a bit chippy. Maybe that's what comes from having to wait til your thirties for your debut. Whilst he's a very good seamer in English conditions, I can't see him being much of a factor in The Ashes. Which makes his elevation in the third test (with Harmy nearing fitness) a somewhat perplexing decision. If he wasn't required for Lords why pick him now?
I think it shows that he's not considered a viable option just yet - which considering him and Lewis are in effect 7th and 8th in line, that's fair enough.Barney Rubble said:Harsh on Saj.
I think the problem is that when he has a mistake it tends to be a big one.GeraintIsMyHero said:It's quite the myth that Jones is a bad keeper, he has taken an awaful lot of catches lately
How typical, the bowlers leave it to the batsmen yet again...Scaly piscine said:Same old, same old. SL produce a crap first innings score and England fanny about getting the tailenders out.
That sums up why I don't think Lewis is worth the selection.wpdavid said:Hoggard & Lewis with the old ball is exactly what Murali & Vaas would have requested