Twenty20 isn't about slogging it's about shotmaking.Lostman said:i dont think tharanga can play 20//20, he doesnt look like a slogger.
hmm... I don't know. Tharanga doesn't strike me as a batsman who can do some big hitting.chaminda_00 said:Tharanga got to be there somewhere for me, arnold to miss out maybe.
if you say soScaly piscine said:Twenty20 isn't about slogging it's about shotmaking.
He's right. Slogs only go on one region, between long-on and deep square leg. If that was all it took to get runs in Twenty20, teams could just stick three men on the leg-side boundary and that'd be it. You have to play shots all around the wicket if you want to succeed.Lostman said:if you say so![]()
teams always stick 3 men on the leg side boundary in any ODI, there are usually 3 on the leg side and 2 men deep on the off side. Still in the latter parts of an ODI most boundaries come from the ball pulled into midwicket. In most 20/20 this starts around the 8th over so it is nothing more than slogging with the occasional glance into the 3rd man boundary.Barney Rubble said:He's right. Slogs only go on one region, between long-on and deep square leg. If that was all it took to get runs in Twenty20, teams could just stick three men on the leg-side boundary and that'd be it. You have to play shots all around the wicket if you want to succeed.
Four men on the boundary then, or five - it doesn't matter. And the best ODI batsmen score runs all around the wicket in the late overs. Look at Andy Flower with the reverse sweep, or Pietersen's mixture of cover-drives, steps down the wicket and leg-side flicks - Twenty20 is an extension of those skills - improvisation, adaptability, shot selection and natural talent.Lostman said:teams always stick 3 men on the leg side boundary in any ODI, there are usually 3 on the leg side and 2 men deep on the off side. Still in the latter parts of an ODI most boundaries come from the ball pulled into midwicket. In most 20/20 this starts around the 8th over so it is nothing more than slogging with the occasional glance into the 3rd man boundary.
I would rest Murali and probably Vaas or Malinga . Dilshan, Sanath, Arnold should be able to complete 1 bowler's over requirements .dinu23 said:my lineup for the twenty20
1.sana
2.kapugedara
3.sanga
4.mahela
5.dilshan
6.arnold
7.maharoof
8.vaas
9.dilhara
10.malinga
11.murali
I think it just puts players' skills under the microscope - it makes it more obvious who has the talent and who doesn't.Goughy said:In fact, the most refreshing thing about this form of the game is that the excellent players in the other forms of the games are able to perform better than the 20/20 'specialists'
And the type of bowling predicted to be the most expensive isn't!Goughy said:There has already been an evolution in the 20 over game.
After the 1st season in England and then SA it was noticed that the ones expected to succeed (ie the sloggers and pinch hitters) did not.
Could've sworn that was what test cricket was for.Barney Rubble said:I think it just puts players' skills under the microscope - it makes it more obvious who has the talent and who doesn't.
What I meant is that every ball counts for more because it's such a short game - every fielding error, every play and miss, every loose ball.andyc said:Could've sworn that was what test cricket was for.
Don't know about GMT but I know it starts at 5:30 AM NZ time , so Alarm Clocks and early wake up for quick shower , get into work clothes and then front of Telly for 2 1/2 hours before work (in between looking at World Cup soccerdinu23 said:hey, what time is the twenty20 in GMT?
7.15pm - put back a bit so as not to clash with the Football.dinu23 said:hey, what time is the twenty20 in GMT?
Perhaps that they could point out that:wpdavid said:Shame to read Gough's latest whinge on Cricinfo about his nonselection for the ODI's. Previously our players at least had the decency to wait until retirement if they were intent on becoming self-obsessed myopic miserable old gits, but Goughie seems to be in a bit of a hurry. Someone shut him up please .....
Minor details, I'm sure, in Goughie's world. Actually, it's a pity the next WC isn't in the subcontinent, if only because then he wouldn't be interested in going anyway.marc71178 said:Perhaps that they could point out that:
a) he's been injured for weeks
b) he's been almost totally crap for the last 2 or 3 years in ODIs
c) he lied his way out of touring last winter in order to give his "personality" a boost and Duncan has a long memory
Isn't that BST? I'm only asking because the previous guy was asking about GMT.marc71178 said:7.15pm - put back a bit so as not to clash with the Football.