• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** Sri Lanka in England

dinu23

International Debutant
chaminda_00 said:
Tharanga got to be there somewhere for me, arnold to miss out maybe.
hmm... I don't know. Tharanga doesn't strike me as a batsman who can do some big hitting.
 

Barney Rubble

International Coach
Lostman said:
if you say so8-)
He's right. Slogs only go on one region, between long-on and deep square leg. If that was all it took to get runs in Twenty20, teams could just stick three men on the leg-side boundary and that'd be it. You have to play shots all around the wicket if you want to succeed.
 

Lostman

State Captain
Barney Rubble said:
He's right. Slogs only go on one region, between long-on and deep square leg. If that was all it took to get runs in Twenty20, teams could just stick three men on the leg-side boundary and that'd be it. You have to play shots all around the wicket if you want to succeed.
teams always stick 3 men on the leg side boundary in any ODI, there are usually 3 on the leg side and 2 men deep on the off side. Still in the latter parts of an ODI most boundaries come from the ball pulled into midwicket. In most 20/20 this starts around the 8th over so it is nothing more than slogging with the occasional glance into the 3rd man boundary.
 

Barney Rubble

International Coach
Lostman said:
teams always stick 3 men on the leg side boundary in any ODI, there are usually 3 on the leg side and 2 men deep on the off side. Still in the latter parts of an ODI most boundaries come from the ball pulled into midwicket. In most 20/20 this starts around the 8th over so it is nothing more than slogging with the occasional glance into the 3rd man boundary.
Four men on the boundary then, or five - it doesn't matter. And the best ODI batsmen score runs all around the wicket in the late overs. Look at Andy Flower with the reverse sweep, or Pietersen's mixture of cover-drives, steps down the wicket and leg-side flicks - Twenty20 is an extension of those skills - improvisation, adaptability, shot selection and natural talent.
 

Goughy

Hall of Fame Member
There has already been an evolution in the 20 over game.

After the 1st season in England and then SA it was noticed that the ones expected to succeed (ie the sloggers and pinch hitters) did not.

What was realized was that the players with the ability to hit orthodox shots hard (especially straight), the ability to improvise and run hard were the most successful.

20/20, Sloggers need not apply.

In fact, the most refreshing thing about this form of the game is that the excellent players in the other forms of the games are able to perform better than the 20/20 'specialists'
 

JASON

Cricketer Of The Year
dinu23 said:
my lineup for the twenty20
1.sana
2.kapugedara
3.sanga
4.mahela
5.dilshan
6.arnold
7.maharoof
8.vaas
9.dilhara
10.malinga
11.murali
I would rest Murali and probably Vaas or Malinga . Dilshan, Sanath, Arnold should be able to complete 1 bowler's over requirements .
Would play Tharanga instead. (particularly given SL's batting struggle so far even in One Day games)
 

Barney Rubble

International Coach
Goughy said:
In fact, the most refreshing thing about this form of the game is that the excellent players in the other forms of the games are able to perform better than the 20/20 'specialists'
I think it just puts players' skills under the microscope - it makes it more obvious who has the talent and who doesn't.
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
Goughy said:
There has already been an evolution in the 20 over game.

After the 1st season in England and then SA it was noticed that the ones expected to succeed (ie the sloggers and pinch hitters) did not.
And the type of bowling predicted to be the most expensive isn't!
 

andyc

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Barney Rubble said:
I think it just puts players' skills under the microscope - it makes it more obvious who has the talent and who doesn't.
Could've sworn that was what test cricket was for.
 

Barney Rubble

International Coach
andyc said:
Could've sworn that was what test cricket was for.
What I meant is that every ball counts for more because it's such a short game - every fielding error, every play and miss, every loose ball.

There's so much less margin for error - in Test cricket you can bowl a bad ball, and the batsman might leave it alone and you'll get away with it. You can hide a poor fielder at third man and he might only cost you five runs an innings, whereas in Twenty20 he'd cost you about 20, and they could easily cost you the game. In Twenty20 you've got to be on the spot all the time.
 

JASON

Cricketer Of The Year
dinu23 said:
hey, what time is the twenty20 in GMT?
Don't know about GMT but I know it starts at 5:30 AM NZ time , so Alarm Clocks and early wake up for quick shower , get into work clothes and then front of Telly for 2 1/2 hours before work (in between looking at World Cup soccer :laugh: ) - That's my programme early tomorrow morning NZ time.:D
 

wpdavid

Hall of Fame Member
Shame to read Gough's latest whinge on Cricinfo about his nonselection for the ODI's. Previously our players at least had the decency to wait until retirement if they were intent on becoming self-obsessed myopic miserable old gits, but Goughie seems to be in a bit of a hurry. Someone shut him up please .....
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
wpdavid said:
Shame to read Gough's latest whinge on Cricinfo about his nonselection for the ODI's. Previously our players at least had the decency to wait until retirement if they were intent on becoming self-obsessed myopic miserable old gits, but Goughie seems to be in a bit of a hurry. Someone shut him up please .....
Perhaps that they could point out that:
a) he's been injured for weeks
b) he's been almost totally crap for the last 2 or 3 years in ODIs
c) he lied his way out of touring last winter in order to give his "personality" a boost and Duncan has a long memory
 

wpdavid

Hall of Fame Member
marc71178 said:
Perhaps that they could point out that:
a) he's been injured for weeks
b) he's been almost totally crap for the last 2 or 3 years in ODIs
c) he lied his way out of touring last winter in order to give his "personality" a boost and Duncan has a long memory
Minor details, I'm sure, in Goughie's world. Actually, it's a pity the next WC isn't in the subcontinent, if only because then he wouldn't be interested in going anyway.
 

Top