Could not agree more. There is never a need to play 5 specialist bowlers. 4 plus a couple of guys to fill in over a long innings if needed is all that is requiredaussie said:Theirfore England have the luxury of extending the batting & could have Flintoff batting down at #7 which he shoud since he is England best bowler & for the workload he does he should not be batting in the top 6 at all..
Yes there is. In the ashes the fact that England had 5 quality bowlers was crucial, obviously they are only able to do this because of Freddy but it gave them such a huge advantage of Australia who run out of options very quicklyGoughy said:Could not agree more. There is never a need to play 5 specialist bowlers. 4 plus a couple of guys to fill in over a long innings if needed is all that is required
England had 4 quality bowlers against Australia. Australia ran out of options because they had at most 2 bowlers bowling quality in any given Test. This was what was crucial, not the fact that England had 5 bowlers and Australia 4.Pothas said:Yes there is. In the ashes the fact that England had 5 quality bowlers was crucial, obviously they are only able to do this because of Freddy but it gave them such a huge advantage of Australia who run out of options very quickly
I would argue there is never any need to play 7 specilaist batsmen (not including the keeper) atleast for a good and posotive side anyway.
But De Mel is going to be in England for the next 2 Tests, and he will be just outside the door when the tour selectors select the Team.dinu23 said:I think the our batsmen have done well here. Don't forget Sussex are on top of their division this season. I don't think Sanath will make it to the team now. Moody would want to prove a point to De Mel by sticking with Vandort or Mubarak.
dinu23 said:I think the our batsmen have done well here. Don't forget Sussex are on top of their division this season.
marc71178 said:To be fair, the Sussex first team are top of their division - only about 3 or 4 of that side is playing.
there is uncertainty about De Mel going to England. It seems the team management don't want him to come.JASON said:But De Mel is going to be in England for the next 2 Tests, and he will be just outside the door when the tour selectors select the Team.
Moody will do well to heed De Mel. (and just because the Team did well to save the Test at Lords does not mean the slate has been wiped clean WRT Moody).
And Moody will need a bullet if he picks Mubarak again. So the choice IMO is between Sanath J and Vandort , and I know who most Sri Lankans want to play in the Second Test !
you're right. All the bowlers in this Sussex team are pretty mediocre, apart from Kirtley.It's dissapointing they didn't play their top players.JASON said:And that was my point.
And why should he heed De Mel?JASON said:Moody will do well to heed De Mel. (and just because the Team did well to save the Test at Lords does not mean the slate has been wiped clean WRT Moody).
And Moody will need a bullet if he picks Mubarak again. So the choice IMO is between Sanath J and Vandort , and I know who most Sri Lankans want to play in the Second Test !
We had Trevor Penney last year, but he's now the Sri Lankan assistant coach.sideshowtim said:Do England have a fielding coach or not? Their fielding has never, ever been great but it was exposed against Sri Lanka last test, they really need to do something about it because that level of fielding in the Ashes won't be good enough. In the Ashes it wasn't even that great, ours was just much worse.
Disappointing, but understandable.dinu23 said:you're right. All the bowlers in this Sussex team are pretty mediocre, apart from Kirtley.It's dissapointing they didn't play their top players.
Ah yeah, I remember that bloke fielded for you in the Ashes.superkingdave said:We had Trevor Penney last year, but he's now the Sri Lankan assistant coach.