Yeah, played very well and daresay changed a few opinions. Hard to blame him too much for chancing his arm there, though it was a disappointing way to go after working so hard.Nice knock from Prasanna tbf. SL might have a good total if a few more of his fellow batsmen showed the same temperament.
Thinking the same and when people start saying things like WAC, shows a lack of class.Isn't it a bit bit too easy to all jump on the Broad is garbage wagon? Sure He's not been showing what has shown in the past (ocasionally). But I don't think his bowling was that crap. I could very well argue he has been a bit unlucky today!
Setting some high standards there.. three batsmen averaging 50+ in that lineup.You'd have to fancy a good attack to have dismissed SL for under 100 in these conditions. Whether their attack is good enough to make England pay is debatable, but this hasn't been nearly good enough apart from Tremlett.
Yeah, but having removed two of them by the time the side had reached 39, they shouldn't have let them off the hook. Badly worded on my part in my previous effort.Setting some high standards there.. three batsmen averaging 50+ in that lineup.
Would be interested to hear your definition of "good attack" given ignoring Broad the other three are all better than good. Can't think of too many attacks in history who could roll out sides for under 100 on demand whenever the conditions suit.You'd have to fancy a good attack to have dismissed SL for under 100 in these conditions. Whether their attack is good enough to make England pay is debatable, but this hasn't been nearly good enough apart from Tremlett.
dwta. I don't rate this sl lineup, but tbf they've notched up 400 scored twice in this series already. agreed dilshan had something to with it, but still this side is not a sub 100 bad.You'd have to fancy a good attack to have dismissed SL for under 100 in these conditions. Whether their attack is good enough to make England pay is debatable, but this hasn't been nearly good enough apart from Tremlett.