• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

**Official** Sri Lanka in England / Scotland - 2011

BoyBrumby

Englishman
Was it clearer than the one where Sanga did get given out?

Whats annoying is, ****s will genuinely use things like this as an argument against UDRS. I don't need to explain to you all how flawed the logic is in that but there you go.
Ha, quite. A wrong decision isn't overturned with UDRS versus a wrong decision.

I make that a draw at best.
 

Spark

Global Moderator
Why is Anderson using his outswinger to the LH as his stock? Would have thought the opposite was the better option.
 

Uppercut

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Why is Anderson using his outswinger to the LH as his stock? Would have thought the opposite was the better option.
It's an interesting debate. A leg-spinner would always prefer his stock ball to be attacking the edge and his change-up to be attacking the stumps, but it's harder for Jimmeh to pick up a wicket with the one that goes straight on. That said, it's much more common to get a batsman out playing when they don't need to than it is to get them out leaving when they need to play. It makes sense to hammer the openers with the outswinger until they start leaving more readily than usual.

Depends on Jimmeh too. Suspect he might just feel his control of the away-swinger is a little better.
 

Spark

Global Moderator
It's an interesting debate. A leg-spinner would always prefer his stock ball to be attacking the edge and his change-up to be attacking the stumps, but it's harder for Jimmeh to pick up a wicket with the one that goes straight on. That said, it's much more common to get a batsman out playing when they don't need to than it is to get them out leaving when they need to play. It makes sense to hammer the openers with the outswinger until they start leaving more readily than usual.

Depends on Jimmeh too. Suspect he might just feel his control of the away-swinger is a little better.
I say that because in the past he's used his inswinger as his stock much more to LHs and been very good with it.

Scary prospect nonetheless. That last one's moved a mile.
 
Last edited:

Uppercut

Request Your Custom Title Now!
I say that because in the past he's used his inswinger as his stock much more to LHs and been very good with it.
Never for very long. The commentators were making the same point when he was bowling outswingers to Graeme Smith three years ago. Which actually coincides with the emergence of Jimmeh as a quality test bowler.
 

vcs

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Anderson is just fantastic ATM. Brilliant to watch such good swing bowling.
 

Manee

Cricketer Of The Year
Depends on Jimmeh too. Suspect he might just feel his control of the away-swinger is a little better.
It is probably that the ball that is a little too wide of off stump swinging away is okay, often a dot ball, builds pressure, etc, but the ball which swings down the leg side relieves pressure and therefore is totally useless. Therefore, the outswinger is taken as the stock to build pressure.
 

Manee

Cricketer Of The Year
This Anderson chap frightens the **** outta me. He is actually going to destroy India using levels of swing never previously seen, isn't he!
 

vcs

Request Your Custom Title Now!
This is fantastic bowling. You're going to need a ****load of discipline and luck to survive an Anderson spell, the way he's bowling ATM.
 

Top