• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** Sri Lanka in England and Ireland 2014

Daemon

Request Your Custom Title Now!
So is a no ball, does that make it 'cheating'? Very strong term that.
Yeah, someone compared it to a batsmen coming down the wicket but a no ball is a much better comparison imo. In both instances the players are (usually in the case of batsmen) not intentionally trying to gain an extra advantage with the few inches, not to mention not breaking any laws.
 
Last edited:

YorksLanka

International Debutant
Cook lost a lot of respect in my eyes from his interview last night..He is entitled to his opinion on the run out of Buttler but when asked if he would do the same , at least grow a set and not sit on the fence with an answer like the one he gave. If he feels it so wrong, then shouldn't his automatic answer be "no i wouldn't do that". Lets be honest here, if it was Australia they were playing against , in the same situation and it was England's option, the outcome would be likely to be exactly the same. Simple fact which has been repeated over and over is, if Butler was in his crease, he couldn't be run out. Cook was also very poor imo with his comment that "if we scored 250 it would have very difficult for them" err but you didnt !! If's and but's are about as useful as a chocolate fireguard..Man up and stop trying to deflect the criticism that you will get for losing to a team that you had all the inside information on from the coach, and played in conditions that suited you rather than us...2-0 to Mathews who despite the crowd and England players barracking him(again which they are entitled to do), showed his character by winning the match and also standing by his decision to endorse the run out when asked during the post match interview. well done to him.
 
Last edited:

wpdavid

Hall of Fame Member
I hope the takeaway from the mankading is that the umpires stop asking the captain if the batsman is out. Would add an interesting dimension to limited overs cricket I would think.
I agree. It puts a ridiculous 'moral' pressure on the captain which, as others have said far more articulately than me, is unreasonable.
One warning is fine. After that, the batsman has no defence.

And the more I think about it, the more astonished I am that Buttler didn't learn from what happened to his Somerset colleague a couple of years ago.

Cook's comments are really disappointing. I really don't buy this guff about 'crossing the line', which is usually a fine line in hypcrisy as all teams claim that whatever they do is the right side of the line, whereas a whole different set of standards apply to their opponents. Of course, we heard loads of that from down under in the winter.

Flintoff's comments are sadly predictable.
 

Maximas

Cricketer Of The Year
There's nothing like a gracious winner. And that's nothing like a gracious winner.
It means a lot as a SL fan to win this series, the coach, the contracts - it's been a mess and it's nice to come out the other side having won, all this controversy and comment in the aftermath sours the taste a little, particularly as the whole thing is nonsense.

as for the 'cheating' thing, my understanding of the rules was that you weren't meant to be out of your crease as the ball was being delivered, but I could well be wrong about that, if so then cheating was not the right word. What I was essentially trying to say was that the batsman is doing the wrong thing and not the mankader.
 
Last edited:

King Pietersen

International Captain
KP on Facebook:

England selectors meeting today...I'm ready to go! Fancy Lords next week...I'm a number 4 batter & bowl off spin. #KPforLords :'(
 

Viscount Tom

International Debutant
So what team do we reckon we'll be treated to for the tests from England.

Cook
Carberry
Bell
Ballance
Root
Stokes
Ali
Foster
Broad
Jordan
Anderson

Would probably be mine given the doubts over Prior's fitness.

And a gem of a team from a poster on the BBC.
Cook
Bell
Pieterson
Root
Bell
Bopara
Prior
Broad
Swann
Anderson
Sidebottom
 

Adders

Cricketer Of The Year
Some hard hitting words by Dobell England must confront failings to improve | Cricket News | England v Sri Lanka | ESPN Cricinfo and gotta say I agree with most of them.........

So it is a shame that Cook would label Angelo Mathews' decision to sustain the appeal against Buttler "a pretty poor act" in the immediate aftermath of the game. While Cook, to his credit, also admitted that England's batting had been poor throughout the series and that their total at Edgbaston was 20 below par, he must have known that, once he criticised his counterpart, such confessions would be lost amid the fallout. Perhaps a stronger leader would have declined the opportunity to make excuses and admitted his side's failings.

England would be deluding themselves, too, if they hid behind the bowling action of a Sri Lankan spinner. Whether it is suspect or not - independent testing will reveal the answers over the next few weeks - England will face many similar actions around the world. The sooner they accept that the world has moved on, that mystery spin is only a mystery to them, the better.

In years to come, perhaps when Moeen Ali has normalised the doosra in England, mystery spin will be viewed in the same way as reverse swing: a key skill in obtaining movement on flat pitches. And just as England's mistrust of reverse swing eventually turned into acceptance and even affection, the same will happen with mystery spin.

It would be nice, too, if England simply stopped talking about the spirit of cricket. It is not relevant when their batsmen decline to walk. It is not relevant when their batsmen, in fighting for a draw, change their gloves and ask for drinks in order to use up time. It is not relevant when their bowlers sledge or try to persuade the umpire to change a ball that is not swinging. And it is not relevant when they lure coaches from opposition teams weeks before they face them in a series.

All such issues are seen - right or wrong - as part and parcel of the professional game. So to talk of spirit only when they lose leaves them looking weak, graceless and hypocritical. Only by confronting their failings and not grasping for excuses will they start to improve
 

YorksLanka

International Debutant
So what team do we reckon we'll be treated to for the tests from England.

Cook
Carberry
Bell
Ballance
Root
Stokes
Ali
Foster
Broad
Jordan
Anderson

Would probably be mine given the doubts over Prior's fitness.

And a gem of a team from a poster on the BBC.
good team, but would it be an opportunity for England to try Sam Robson / Adam Lyth considering the weaker opposition?Whilst Carberry has done well, surely this would give an indication of the future whilst not risking the series against stronger test opposition?Personally i would also have Buttler instead of Foster for the same reason.I know Foster is a very very good keeper tho..
 

flibbertyjibber

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Press have Plunkett in their squads. England must see him as a Johnson type then, short bursts at pace to unsettle the opposition. Only reason I can see to bring him back.
 

Top