I disagree a bit, think the pitch is turning and at a decent pace and height, unlike Lords. It's not a bunsen, but if we had a class spinner we could exploit it, but.....Herath still causing plenty of issues on a completely unsuitable track
Reckon if the deliveries were swapped around it would have been given tbhPeople complain about excessive appealing, but in the end this shows why, they went up for the other one massively, a weak ump like Billy gives it? They just ask a question politely, Bowden turns it down right away when if he'd given this one it would have been out.
Thought they kept a lid n things earlier, but we're seeing now that there's just no place for being unthreatening. These two now have all the license they need to get proactive and the bowlers are losing it as a result. Looks grim for the Sri Lankans from here.these bowlers are ****ing ****.
I didn't see the spell to Cook but I'd back myself to nick him off at the moment. Been watching for about an hour and there has been one threatening delivery.Thought they kept a lid n things earlier, but we're seeing now that there's just no place for being unthreatening. These two now have all the license they need to get proactive and the bowlers are losing it as a result. Looks grim for the Sri Lankans from here.
Best thing is I know that Ballance at least rarely comes out blazing, he just seriously picks up as his innings goes on.Not sure why they continue to bring up this "turgid" top order thing. When England were at their best, we had Strauss, Cook and Trott at the top, they were hardly forcing the pace. In Test cricket I couldn't give a **** if they bat slightly slowly at the top so long as they're scoring runs. I'd take a bloke that bats slowly and averages 50, than some T20 slogger that gets a score away every now and then and averages <40.
Sri Lanka's dropping of Kulasekara is looking a worse decision by the over.
Bowled 13 in an innings against Bangladesh, 17 in the match. Weirdly, Ajantha Mendis bowled 12 in the same game.Pradeep was the one who bowled about three thousand no balls in a match vs Pakistan, wasn't he?
This is all well and good but we've seen over the last year that scoring slowly does bring problems wrt pressure, requirements to make a big score, bowlers taking effective control of the game situation etcNot sure why they continue to bring up this "turgid" top order thing. When England were at their best, we had Strauss, Cook and Trott at the top, they were hardly forcing the pace. In Test cricket I couldn't give a **** if they bat slightly slowly at the top so long as they're scoring runs. I'd take a bloke that bats slowly and averages 50, than some T20 slogger that gets a score away every now and then and averages <40.
Sri Lanka's dropping of Kulasekara is looking a worse decision by the over.