SupaFreak2005
International Vice-Captain
Well 40/4 and as usual we're doing crap. *shakes fist*
The reason for doing that was to try and bolster the middle order batting as we were having problems there. That was the reason given here. Gibbs was chosen as he felt he would do very well down the batting order.marc71178 said:Can anyone explain the logic in moving Gibbs to the middle order and replacing him with Dippenaar?
Yet it fitted the situation in this thread perfectly!shaka said:oops, i meant it to go in black caps thread, sorry!
He scored the second fastest ton of all time in test cricket, or something like that, when Australia last toured the WI.shaka said:Chanderpaul has never been the quickest scorer of runs. 30 odd runs in 90 odd deliveries backs this up.
That was more of a flash in the pan than anything else. He is not known as a quick scorer, but he can when the conditions suit.vic_orthdox said:He scored the second fastest ton of all time in test cricket, or something like that, when Australia last toured the WI.
Good to see Lawson doing well. Bowled with a bit of pace but his line and length were good. Doesn't help convincing the selectors when you score 11, 6 and 13.roseboy64 said:South Africa narrowly beat the Jamaica XI by 29 runs.
Scores:
SA- 245 all out (50 ov)
-Dippenaar 64, Boucher 59, Prince 32, Lawson 4-39, B Brown 4-41
JA- 216 all out (46.1 ov)
-Gordon 70, B Brown 37*, Clarke 23, Pollock 4-18 (8ov), Nel 2-36 (7ov)
Notables: SA- de Villiers 0, Kemp 21, Ontong 0-53 (7ov), Langeveldt 1-32 (9ov)
JA- Marshall 11, Samuels 6, Baugh 13, Washington 0-20 (4ov)
It wasn't that full - it was good to full length and the WI tail weren't competent enough to deal with the ones that did for them. Bradshaw played across the line and Powell's shot was woeful.aussie said:ignorance in barbados, how did WI loose that they are so laaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaame
but credit for langevelt for followin the old sayin of bowling full at the death