Prince EWS
Global Moderator
Zakir is a keeper as well. Very weird selection.Could Mushfiq not keep? Also I'd have happily have had Nurul there. Who the **** is Ankon
Zakir is a keeper as well. Very weird selection.Could Mushfiq not keep? Also I'd have happily have had Nurul there. Who the **** is Ankon
It is a bit strange to still play 7 batsmen when you are 1-0 down , I would have thought Bangladesh would be more confident at home,.especially after winning in PakistanCould Mushfiq not keep? Also I'd have happily have had Nurul there. Who the **** is Ankon
It started to feel like a fluke series win tbhIt is a bit strange to still play 7 batsmen when you are 1-0 down , I would have thought Bangladesh would be more confident at home,.especially after winning in Pakistan
It's time we accept that Markram is never going to be our batting fulcrum.Markram throws it away yet again what a waste
I never thought he would be the batting fulcrum but I expected him to be better. We again have the situation of a player not quite good enough but probably going to hang around because he is likely to be captain for a while.It's time we accept that Markram is never going to be our batting fulcrum.
Turning out to be the next Jacques RudolphIt's time we accept that Markram is never going to be our batting fulcrum.
I've put him into the Duminy category for us now. A player who looks like they should average 45+ plus but finds ways to get out. He is 30 now, it's not impossible for him to have 3/4 years of sustained output but judging by what we have seen I think it's unlikely.I never thought he would be the batting fulcrum but I expected him to be better. We again have the situation of a player not quite good enough but probably going to hang around because he is likely to be captain for a while.
The problem is away from home for Markram..I've put him into the Duminy category for us now. A player who looks like they should average 45+ plus but finds ways to get out. He is 30 now, it's not impossible for him to have 3/4 years of sustained output but judging by what we have seen I think it's unlikely.
Yep that's a good point.The problem is away from home for Markram..
At home he averages 43 with the bat, away it's just 22..
Elgar had the same problem
Yeah Markram should be averaging 40 at a minimum with his talent , I place him talent wise on par with Herschelle Gibbs (Another underachiever in Test cricket)I've put him into the Duminy category for us now. A player who looks like they should average 45+ plus but finds ways to get out. He is 30 now, it's not impossible for him to have 3/4 years of sustained output but judging by what we have seen I think it's unlikely.
I was going to say that he doesn't have as many technical issues as Elgar but he has two glaring ones.The problem is away from home for Markram..
At home he averages 43 with the bat, away it's just 22..
Elgar had the same problem
Especially with the decks we dish out at home.Our batsmen couldn't ask for better conditions to fill their boots.
I think it's important we have a test opener who sets the tone and if he gets in can dominate and get on top of a bowling attack. I don't think we have anyone else who can do it like Markram. So I guess we have to live by the inconsistencies until we have someone absolutely knocking the door down.I was going to say that he doesn't have as many technical issues as Elgar but he has two glaring ones.
1. He feels outside off. Which is why SA fans haven't bought into him as an opener. In SA, visiting teams don't always bowl the correct length and he is a good enough player to punish that. Same with Elgar.
2. He also reads spin off the pitch. Which is why he gets in a tangle often when he faces someone who has subtle variations. Again, in SA you can get away with that unless we are in Durban or PE.