spot on sean, without Kallis their middle order in this test at least isn't such that would worry australia that much..FaaipDeOiad said:I was saying earlier to someone when the first wicket fell that it was important SA didn't lose another before lunch. I just don't think very highly of their middle-order right now.
Rudolph is decent but not a player who's likely to dominate against Australia. Prince is obviously unproven, and Kemp is similar. Without Kallis, things look very fragile once you get past number 3, and Gibbs has never had success against Warne, either. With Boucher's batting in decline, you'd really be worried as a South African fan about what might happen after the second or third wicket goes down.
Cause it's not sold out, I guessJdz said:Why the **** isn't Perth getting the cricket?
yea kinda, but its a new record and another one for Warney, most wickets in a year well done, he has had a tremendous year with the ballburkey_1988 said:Lucky LBW there for Warney
Oh yeah, it's great that he got the record. It'd just a shame for Sth Afr it wasn't outaussie said:yea kinda, but its a new record and another one for Warney, most wickets in a year well done, he has had a tremendous year with the ball
It wasn't?burkey_1988 said:Oh yeah, it's great that he got the record. It'd just a shame for Sth Afr it wasn't out
its just with cricket i have this double mindedness where i support australia n still i support england for reasons i'm too tired to explain. Everything other sport i support england...Blaze said:Aussie can I ask why you support Aus in cricket yet you support England in football?
It was Boucher.parttimer said:Nel shaking his head claiming he didn't hit it.. replays showed it came straight off the glove. What a parasite
My apologies to Nel. My anger got the better of me_Ed_ said:It was Boucher.