-
Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
***Official*** South Africa in Australia
- Thread starter howardj
- Start date
No.
SpaceMonkey
International Debutant
Australians using sub fielders...i hope Ponting isnt going to whine!
FaaipDeOiad
Hall of Fame Member
I was saying earlier to someone when the first wicket fell that it was important SA didn't lose another before lunch. I just don't think very highly of their middle-order right now.
Rudolph is decent but not a player who's likely to dominate against Australia. Prince is obviously unproven, and Kemp is similar. Without Kallis, things look very fragile once you get past number 3, and Gibbs has never had success against Warne, either. With Boucher's batting in decline, you'd really be worried as a South African fan about what might happen after the second or third wicket goes down.
Rudolph is decent but not a player who's likely to dominate against Australia. Prince is obviously unproven, and Kemp is similar. Without Kallis, things look very fragile once you get past number 3, and Gibbs has never had success against Warne, either. With Boucher's batting in decline, you'd really be worried as a South African fan about what might happen after the second or third wicket goes down.
FaaipDeOiad
Hall of Fame Member
Yeah, was definately out. Pitched on leg, would have hit middle or middle and off.