Prince EWS
Global Moderator
Yeah, I'm not really sure Hasting actually is an example of what I was talking about; the pitch he played on last week for example was actually very flat after Day 1 and he bowled a marathon spell to end with great figures against (admittedly) South Australia, and unlike Copeland or even Bird etc he actually does really well in the Ryobi Cup on the flatter decks. I think he's just going to be a case of "a little better than he looks" on whatever deck he bowls on and although I don't think he'll ever really be a Test standard option and wouldn't have picked him here, I don't think the pitches are having too much to do with his success. Not as much as some of the others anyway.MCG hasn't been that bad, it's been tough on the first day and then quite often very flat for the remaining days, a few big scores have been made; and large chases on day 4 completed.
Hastings never looks threatening, no matter what level he's playing, but he's always managed enough to get wickets and give the captain some control. Obviously he didn't today; really, this was the risk that was taken by selecting an all new pace attack.
My point was that people should definitely get used to Australian bowlers with awesome First Class averages looking pretty average; there are bowlers with better records who look even more innocuous than Hastings floating around. Hopefully the CA directive to the states to get their acts together re: the pitches hits home pretty quickly. A few seasons back it was hard to avoid because of how wet it was in general but there's no excuse now.
Last edited: