More inclined to blame the batting. In any bookie's world 24 hours ago Australia would be 6 or 7 down.
Amla and Smith would have been a lot more circumspect without a first-innings lead that was gifted to them.
The same Johnson, Starc, Hastings, Lyon Watson skittled over the same SA lineup for 225 a day ago. The batsmen have handed back the initiative on a platter and the inexperienced bowlers have had to contend with two guys in peak form. The way Amla and Smith batted, one could almost feel a sense of payback for the first day humiliation in Adelaide. Amazing viewing for a neutral, what an off the rope kickback from SA...Rumble In The Jungle analogies all over the place
Obviously it is a bit easy to combine both your arguements and fight debate them as if they cam form the same poster, but still...., here I go.
IMHO, the SA 225 all-out was nothing but an accident. Sometimes, not-so-great bowlers bowl super spells. Sometimes great batting line-ups get out for just a few runs. Sometimes, things just happen against the odds. When England toured Aus 2 years ago, the Aus win was nothing but a blip in an otherwise totally England controlled series. Happens in cricket. Happens in any sport actually. If Holland play England 20 times in a cricket match, the Dutch will win one or two of those (one just has to get the timing right, for instance a World Cup opening match).
It is my opinion that the SA top 7 bating order is the best in the world at the moment. And it is my opinion that the Aussie attack is weaker than it has been for what........, 20 years? I dunno, since I've been watching cricket only since 1993. At the start of this series, I figured that the Aussies might have problems to take 20 SA wickets. Though that was a bit of a teaser (I posted it in this thread, I think), from where we are now, it seems bloody likely it will actually go that way. My point: the Australian bowlers are not good enough for Smith, Kallis, Amla, De Villiers & Du Plessis. Not having (fit) Cummins, Pattinson, Hilfenhaus & Siddle doesn't help.
Also, after day one, I never felt Aus were ahead.
@Arachnodouche,
I am, like you, a neutral viewer. I would have hoped for a more equal test. To kick in an open door: The Saffers will never ever allow the Aussies to get back into this test. Won't happen! And the only good thing about that is that I have no need to get out of bed at 6:10 am on a sunday pick up from the 2nd session. Third session starts at 8:30, which is just fine.