Also a bit of "go hard or go home" about it. They're not going to be good enough to edge a lot of balls, and swing hard at those in their arc, which a proper batsman doesn't have license to do.Broad and Swann would have been eaten alive against the Indian bowling in the afternoon session, they were only able to counter because the fast bowlers had been bowling for two straight sessions. If conditions are the same as they were yesterday India should be looking to battle through the first few salvos and cash in when the bowling tires.
Impressive attempt at reverse jinx there, but you're not fooling anybody.England's match to lose.
given that indian batting line-up isn't as strong as it normally is, it's probably par.I think everyone agrees it's well below par - I'd say about 40-50 runs - but we're just commenting that 220 keeps us in the game.
even if the swing is somewhat reduced by the lack of cloud cover, the pitch is a very seam friendly one. there should still be a lot in it for the bowlers. it will take some excellent batting for the indians to get a lead.What's the weather like in Notts? Bright blue sky here, hope it's not nationwide
Which they're good enough to do, unless one or two of the England quicks get it 100% right straight away. For all the playing and missing last night, there was also a lot of leaving. The ball's already 15 overs old, so they need to make the most of it ASAP.Broad and Swann would have been eaten alive against the Indian bowling in the afternoon session, they were only able to counter because the fast bowlers had been bowling for two straight sessions. If conditions are the same as they were yesterday India should be looking to battle through the first few salvos and cash in when the bowling tires.
England batting lineup with Anderson at 11 cannot be expected to be rolled over by our poor bowling lineup 2 times in 5 daysImpressive attempt at reverse jinx there, but you're not fooling anybody.
Without wanting to sound trollish, I think they were mainly just lucky last night. The bowling was quite a bit better than it was at Lord's and they played a ridiculous number of false shots.Which they're good enough to do, unless one or two of the England quicks get it 100% right straight away. For all the playing and missing last night, there was also a lot of leaving. The ball's already 15 overs old, so they need to make the most of it ASAP.
Not trollish at all -simply a slightly different take on the situation to mine. They certainly had moments of luck, and I think we all agree that the first hour today is absolutely vital. Looks set for a daddy from one of their galacticos imo.Without wanting to sound trollish, I think they were mainly just lucky last night. The bowling was quite a bit better than it was at Lord's and they played a ridiculous number of false shots.
You'd still be backing them to get a first innings lead but ideally they'll want 300+ having chosen to bowl first. The most awkward innings for batting will be the first and last so they need to push home the advantage early on. A bit of sunshine will make a big difference but they'll need to really step it up from Lord's, I think rolling over for 250~ again makes England favourites.
The headline was probably not written by Lawton, I suppose.
Yea I really don't get why they don't show those anymore. Half the time a batsman hits the ball and I have no idea if a fielder is there or not until the camera shows it. Surely it wouldn't take much to flash the field map once in a while?They used to show field maps a lot butit really seems to have gone out of fashion. Doesn't show off the latest piece of technology enough I guess.
Yep, the following quoteThe headline was probably not written by Lawton, I suppose.
However, the article is full of Lawton's usual failings, especially when it comes to cricket.
had me thinking whether we indeed did roll England all out for 220...It is a mood which India need to capture with some speed if they are to hold on to their mythic crown.
Lawton was the only member of the Independent's cricket writing staff to back the Indians beforehand & I think there's been an element of the jilted lover about his writing on the series so far.The headline was probably not written by Lawton, I suppose.
However, the article is full of Lawton's usual failings, especially when it comes to cricket.
Well there you go, it never happened, which comes as quite a relief to me.Yep, the following quote
had me thinking whether we indeed did roll England all out for 220...
:facepalm:True, he did think about appealing for a caught and bowled against Ian Bell – and actually threw the ball in the air – but he was quickly calmed down by Dhoni, who pointed out that first- bounce catches do not count at this level.