Jono
Virat Kohli (c)
Haha yes WCW on Sunday mornings I remember watching that, mind you I had no idea what was going on. I'd just cheer for Sting and Lugermasterblaster said:Your allegations astound me!
I'll have you know I've watched plenty of WCW throughout 1994 (when it used to be on Channel 9's Sunday mornings )till about it ended in 2001. I always enjoyed the athletic aspect of WCW even though most of their storylines made no sense whatsoever. In fact during much of 1996-1998 WCW was the better show on television without doubt.
A few years back, when we were talking I NEVER said that I only cared for pyro, entertainment and 'superficial gloss'. I simply stated that production values certainly help enhance the product, and at that time TNA were much more far behind than they are now and WWE were much far ahead in terms of producing a good product both in ring wise and production wise (Evolution, Brock Lesnar, the Smackdown Six anyone?).
In terms of wrestling I always appreciated what TNA brought to the table. Now though, their product (I think) is a little superior to WWE's at the moment.
I just feel that mediocre wrestling + production value isn't as good as entertaining wrestling with very little production value. Of course if you can mix the two evenly then you have a great product, and I think WWE did that well from 97-2002 (bar a few hiccups eg. Invasion) and WCW did that very well up until 98 or so.
The Smackdown six only lasted a few months in 2002, then in 2003 (post Mania) we started seeing Smackdown fall into depths of crap, and Raw being the Evolution show. It was at this time I really got into ROH and TNA. Yeah they didn't have pyro and awesome storylines, JR yelling "Bah Gawd" and cool video clips to recap feuds, but they did the fundamentals right. Entertain the crowd in the ring.