dontcloseyoureyes
BARNES OUT
CW: *making ranking tables and discussing in depth who the top guy is*
Me: hur dur he hit him hard in the head *claps*
Me: hur dur he hit him hard in the head *claps*
Reigns is a bit like diet Cena imo. He absolutely gets the biggest reactions even if a lot of the smarkier audience is digging the boot into him. That said where I placed Reigns is where the enjoyment of that “top guy era” takes a deep dive. I more think of him as undeniably being the #1 of his era and the build to his matches being important than those below him.I'm not sure how you can have Reigns that far up. He's been a very long failure by almost any measure...? even if you do like him personally, he's flopped for so long...
The WON Wrestler of the Year awards (which is essentially the top guys in the business across all companies, as opposed to the 'Outstanding Wrestler') is not a pretty picture. He's not been in the top 10 any year. This is supposed to be WWE's ace and no-one cares if he's there or not.
https://sites.google.com/site/chrisharrington/mookieghana-prowrestlingstatistics/wo_awards_history
Haha I definitely do enjoy the latter albeit not as much as you do. I’m definitely a bit of an idiot in that I quite enjoy the dumber soap opera aspects of wrestling quite a lot as well.CW: *making ranking tables and discussing in depth who the top guy is*
Me: hur dur he hit him hard in the head *claps*
The WON Wrestler of the Year awards (which is essentially the top guys in the business across all companies
Have ended up keeping an eye on it.Anyone watching Mania?
I thought maybe they'd try something radical with production and I suppose we may see it with the more bizarre matches like Wyatts or Takers but this mostly feels like recent Raw or Smackdowns with slightly better wrestling.