I think a lot depends on how they handle this Mox angle and title reign. A couple of months of BCC terrorising the show and Mox looking invincible could be fun providing 1) it doesn't run too long and 2) they put over a new star (or ideally stars) decisively at the end I think it could be good. Darby the obvious choice to eventually topple Mox. Maybe OC and Garcia can help him take down the BCC. But as ever it depends how they stick the landing. Lots of big wrestling angles start hot but fizzle out before the story is finished, so we'll see if they can make this one work.Okay so what's the consensus on the state of AEW now? I used to be the biggest Mox fan but the more I watch of him the less I like. I like his persona and his promos but when he is in the ring I just don't feel it. I actually felt the same when he was Ambrose.
I just feel like after 5 years there should be someone else homegrown in that top spot not named MJF.
Darby is a guy I'd see as a Rey Mysterio style champ, wins the belt and immediately loses the belt.Darby's ceiling is well below world champion level imo. Same for OC and Garcia. They are the archetypal AEW talent (i.e., good at what they do, but have a definite mid-card feel about them - and as mentioned above, it feels to me like they have about 100 guys who could be described like this).
Ricky Starks would have been a better option to get behind for me personally, but seems that he, like many others, has just ended up in booking oblivion/disappeared off the face of the earth.
RE: The Mox title reign - seems like the "higher power" (or whatever they are calling it) that he is answering to will be Shane O'Mac, which imo could be absolutely disastrous (albeit amusingly disastrous).
Yeah. He reminds me of Jeff Hardy from the late 90s/early 2000s tbh. With more star-power and a more developed character though tbf to him.Darby is a guy I'd see as a Rey Mysterio style champ, wins the belt and immediately loses the belt.
Been reading he had his head turned by WWE ages ago and that they may have decided there was no point giving him airtime over someone else in that caseRicky Starks would have been a better option to get behind for me personally, but seems that he, like many others, has just ended up in booking oblivion/disappeared off the face of the earth.
Yeah I've heard that too tbf.Been reading he had his head turned by WWE ages ago and that they may have decided there was no point giving him airtime over someone else in that case
I still follow it but not as closely as before.Okay so what's the consensus on the state of AEW now? I used to be the biggest Mox fan but the more I watch of him the less I like. I like his persona and his promos but when he is in the ring I just don't feel it. I actually felt the same when he was Ambrose.
I just feel like after 5 years there should be someone else homegrown in that top spot not named MJF.
Agree with all of this.I still follow it but not as closely as before.
It would help if they had more faces who the crowd explode for. Too many heels, not enough genuinely exciting faces who get the blood pumping. I'd also echo the usual commentary about too many wrestlers, not enough continuity. It's just piss poor booking.
I also absolutely can't stand the trios and other multiman matches. Every bit of action in them is completely meaningless because the bumps mean nothing story-wise. The proliferation of trios matches is probably the single biggest sticking point for me.
Other complaints: there's so many spectacular spots and sick bumps in every match such that none of them feel special any more. Also their commitment to workrate means that every match is fairly long, so you know going there's no chance there'll be a three count until you're a fair way in. They need to shorten a match or two on the weekly shows.
There's also way too many near falls. And I know the frenetic indie style matches is part of their brand but it would be nice if there was a bit more focus on story.
I do like that they've started making space for more old style gimmicks with Toni Storm's delusional Hollywood diva being the best example. Possibly my favourite character since I started watching wrestling again.
I'm also finding that their womens division is suddenly the best thing about the company, with Jamie Hayter, Toni Storm and Willow Nightingale probably the most over characters there with few exceptions. Britt Baker also had the crowd on her side before she got suspended and there's a bunch of others who are worth watching. But in the best AEW tradition of making stupid booking decisions, they seem to gone back to having **** all womens matches on a card just when they'd got people caring.
I still watch it primarily because the pay per views are amazing and they have top class wrestling, despite my many complaints.
EDIT: I also absolutely agree with the bolded bit. Early on, the maxim seemed to be that AEW "make stars, they don't sign stars". Obviously they now have a long-established pattern of signing everyone in sight, but I also think they've done a poor job of creating the sort of stars who have the star power to carry the company (other than MJF). Wardlow was the one who looked most likely to attain that sort of star power but then every bit of that momentum was somehow squandered.
Do you have any examples of this? Curious about what you're referring to.Still watching Dynamite and some PPV.
I dabble in various interests and I thought I was dealing with some toxic environments but boy wrestling takes the cake.
A non-WWE promotion does something and its crap. WWE does exactly the same thing and all the zoomer kids go ga ga saying its the best thing ever
Twitter/reddit reactions to anything AEW ever does, even if widely positively received by sensible folk.Do you have any examples of this? Curious about what you're referring to.