Dasa
International Vice-Captain
No, it's not.Pratyush said:Its than and not then.
No, it's not.Pratyush said:Its than and not then.
Right my mistake.Dasa said:No, it's not.
What do I win?Nnanden said:Ahh... Afridi attack. He`s still got it.
I reckon his bowling should be very good against the Windies.
Just a word of advice, but if you're going to try and correct what someone has said, firstly it'd make sense not to make a mistake in your correction, and secondly it'd be a good thing to check what you're attempting to correct isn't already right, as in this case it was.Pratyush said:Its than and not then.
I did, you mentioned from the India series on, which reads as the India series, not selected portions.Pratyush said:Read again what I said :
What relevance to his batting does taking wickets have?Pratyush said:Afridi failed in the first three odis in India. In his last 6 odi matches, he has consistently contributed giving good starts or taking wickets with the ball
Well, I do apologise, but those 9 runs don't make my point invalid really, do they?Pratyush said:And I really dont know how ou got that he scored less than 100 runs in the remaining 5 matches in India. 109 is more than 100 the last time I checked.
which changes the fact that hes not very good in tests and his technique hasnt improved one iota since his debut and that he hasnt matured one bit as a player in tests how?Duncan said:Gayle?
Gayle was the only centurion in this series vs Pak... and the only centurion for WI in the SA series.
I know that Marc but mistakes can happen.marc71178 said:Just a word of advice, but if you're going to try and correct what someone has said, firstly it'd make sense not to make a mistake in your correction, and secondly it'd be a good thing to check what you're attempting to correct isn't already right, as in this case it was.
I said starting from the India series which can imply either he started performing consistently from the beginning or from som epoint in the series.I did, you mentioned from the India series on, which reads as the India series, not selected portions.
Consistent performer would take both things into accountWhat relevance to his batting does taking wickets have?
You dont need to apologise it was a mistake and as I said, not a big deal. Doesnt change the point but when you go out of the way to point things usually on people, I thought you wouldnt wimd some one doing the same. 9 runs have no relvence to the point you are making though as you said.Well, I do apologise, but those 9 runs don't make my point invalid really, do they?
Not when you're supposedly correcting something I'd typed which didn't need it.Pratyush said:I know that Marc but mistakes can happen.
Apart from the bit about batting that is...Pratyush said:Consistent performer would take both things into account
What No? It just happened.marc71178 said:Not when you're supposedly correcting something I'd typed which didn't need it.
I was saying about him being a consistent performer.Apart from the bit about batting that is...
Hopefully not!Hope Lara stays in all day