Be some turn for Bandara and Murali though.JASON said:This pitch seems to be absolutely dead flat .
Sanga's double hundred. I guess this will be Sanga's 2nd double hundred against Pakistan. Man this guy relishes pakistani bowling.JASON said:Declaration possibly with a lead of 500 + is my guess ...
What happened to 'all rounder' Afridi?TT Boy said:Pakistan’s problem with this side selected is other than Asif, Kaneria and Gul everyone else is a pick and mix bowler, that leaves three bowlers to bear most of the reasonability and if Gul and Kaneria are off colour than Asif
has one hell of a job to do.
.
Don't you know that he's Veeru's twin!Sanz said:Sanga's double hundred. I guess this will be Sanga's 2nd double hundred against Pakistan. Man this guy relishes pakistani bowling.
not as much as sehwag doesSanz said:Sanga's double hundred. I guess this will be Sanga's 2nd double hundred against Pakistan. Man this guy relishes pakistani bowling.
Again he's a bit and pieces player.SJS said:What happened to 'all rounder' Afridi?
Okay TRolledOver.RolledOver said:Again he's a bit and pieces player.
Having 1 such kind of player in test is fine, but having three in Afridi,Malika nd Razzak is wierd.
Sanga will be sure to blame you for putting 'the mockers' on him !!Sanz said:Sanga's double hundred. I guess this will be Sanga's 2nd double hundred against Pakistan. Man this guy relishes pakistani bowling.
Pakistan's arm was pulled though with the loss of Rana Naved before the test match had began. Umar Gul or Rao Iftikhar were the only other seamers in the squad.RolledOver said:Imran was right when he said that Bob is too defensive.I mean how can you go into a test match with just 3 specialist bowlers??
Sami may be a crap bowler, but i would prefer having him in the test side at the expense of malik or maybe Afridi.
Inzy and Bob are 'mulish' in their obstinacy. Once they decide they like someone they will take any decision to promote that player and vice-versa irrespective of how it affects the team.RolledOver said:Imran was right when he said that Bob is too defensive.I mean how can you go into a test match with just 3 specialist bowlers??
Sami may be a crap bowler, but i would prefer having him in the test side at the expense of malik or maybe Afridi.
Yeah but had Rana been fit he would have taken Umar's place and Pak would still have gone with three bowlers.TT Boy said:Pakistan's arm was pulled though with the loss of Rana Naved before the test match had began. Umar Gul or Rao Iftikhar were the only other seamers in the squad.
True.RolledOver said:Yeah but had Rana been fit he would have taken Umar's place and Pak would still have gone with three bowlers.
I think Pakistan should go into a test match with 4 specialist bowlers.
Would you say Shoaib Malik is another example of that? To me, Afridi is the only one of the Pakistani trio of all-rounders who should play in tests.SJS said:Inzy and Bob are 'mulish' in their obstinacy. Once they decide they like someone they will take any decision to promote that player and vice-versa irrespective of how it affects the team.
Gul was very dissapointing today and yesterday too, but i think he's a bit rusty, comming back to test cricket after 2 years isn't all that easy.TT Boy said:At least Afridi and Malick have kept the runs down, more than can be said for Gul and Razzaq who were leaking runs here, there and everywhere.