• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** Pakistan in England

vic_orthdox

Global Moderator
The whole idea of spin bowling is to lure the batsmen into mistakes. So if you want to, you can write off 75% of a spin bowler's wickets as bad batting, and never acknowledge the bowler's input.
 

UncleTheOne

U19 Captain
Squad same as before for England with the exception of Chris Read in for Geraint Jones. Apparently Jones has been dropped, not left out due to injury, down to his lack of runs according to Graveney.
 

TT Boy

Hall of Fame Member
Armadillo said:
Will Shoaib play in the next test? Will his inclusion bring a significant boost to the team?
You would think so but from all reports the fourth test seems the most likely chance for Shoaib.
 

Scaly piscine

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
vic_orthdox said:
The whole idea of spin bowling is to lure the batsmen into mistakes. So if you want to, you can write off 75% of a spin bowler's wickets as bad batting, and never acknowledge the bowler's input.
That's fine if you're up against Shahid Afridi or West Indies, but most of the time batsmen won't make those mistakes and that's why you've got Vettori averaging 35 and Giles 40. These mistakes are just as likely to come against someone else as they are a spinner anyway.
 

Armadillo

State Vice-Captain
Jones dropped? Reasons given were for poor batting but his injury was disregarded. You would have thought Jones was on a high after his flawless performance with the gloves, needless dropping IMO, just lowering team spirit.
 

silentstriker

The Wheel is Forever
Scaly piscine said:
That's fine if you're up against Shahid Afridi or West Indies, but most of the time batsmen won't make those mistakes and that's why you've got Vettori averaging 35 and Giles 40. These mistakes are just as likely to come against someone else as they are a spinner anyway.

But he is potentially better than both.
 

UncleTheOne

U19 Captain
Armadillo said:
Jones dropped? Reasons given were for poor batting but his injury was disregarded. You would have thought Jones was on a high after his flawless performance with the gloves, needless dropping IMO, just lowering team spirit.
Needless? The bloke can't buy a decent test score right now, he never learns from his mistakes eg. that bloody sweep shot of his, the guy simply isn't good enough with the bat at this level and despite his drastic improvements with the gloves he's still was off Chris Read behind the stumps.
 

Dasa

International Vice-Captain
silentstriker said:
But he is potentially better than both.
A bowling average of ~23 at home in his (brief) career so far. How many bowlers can claim such stats?
 

Scaly piscine

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
silentstriker said:
But he is potentially better than both.
He's obviously better than Giles, but only potentially is he better than Vettori and even that is dubious.

Regardless his average will soon head back towards 35 when he stops getting so helpful pitches and even more helpful batsmen.
 

silentstriker

The Wheel is Forever
Scaly piscine said:
He's obviously better than Giles, but only potentially is he better than Vettori and even that is dubious.

Regardless his average will soon head back towards 35 when he stops getting so helpful pitches and even more helpful batsmen.

Maybe. He hasn't played enough for us to pass a judgement like that. You may be right, but his performance so far means he should at least be persisted with until we know more. I'm not saying he will average Muralis' 22 or Warnes' 25, but he may very well average a Harbhajan-like 29. Which, for the most part, is OK for a spinner, provided he can dominate games in the second innings on certain pitches. He needs to learn the Doosra, and if he does, I think he can be a world-class spinner. He has most of the other tools...but finger spinners need the doosra.
 
Last edited:

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
Scaly piscine said:
That's fine if you're up against Shahid Afridi or West Indies, but most of the time batsmen won't make those mistakes and that's why you've got Vettori averaging 35 and Giles 40. These mistakes are just as likely to come against someone else as they are a spinner anyway.
So it was just a coincidence that they didn't then?

Just a fluke that Monty picked them up.

Precisely how much of his bowling did you see to write it off as luck?
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
Scaly piscine said:
Regardless his average will soon head back towards 35 when he stops getting so helpful pitches and even more helpful batsmen.
Such a helpful pitch that Kaneria and Afridi had combined figures of 58-8-182-2.
 

Scaly piscine

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
silentstriker said:
Maybe. He hasn't played enough for us to pass a judgement like that. You may be right, but his performance so far means he should at least be persisted with until we know more. I'm not saying he will average Muralis' 22 or Warnes' 25, but he may very well average a Harbhajan-like 29. Which, for the most part, is OK for a spinner, provided he can dominate games in the second innings on certain pitches. He needs to learn the Doosra, and if he does, I think he can be a world-class spinner. He has most of the other tools...but finger spinners need the doosra.

But of course while he doesn't have a doosra and doesn't play home games in India then he's going to head towards 35...
 

Scaly piscine

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
marc71178 said:
So it was just a coincidence that they didn't then?

Just a fluke that Monty picked them up.

Precisely how much of his bowling did you see to write it off as luck?
Err did you see some of the batting against Harmison?

Anyone can tell you who knows a bit about cricket that what ends up in that wicket column is a lot down to luck. The stumping and the Inzi wicket were lucky, a good few of the dismissals were simply rubbish shots (or leaves).
 

silentstriker

The Wheel is Forever
Scaly piscine said:
But of course while he doesn't have a doosra and doesn't play home games in India then he's going to head towards 35...

English pitches in the second innings lately haven't been all that bad for spin....
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
Scaly piscine said:
Err did you see some of the batting against Harmison?
Yes, I also saw his entire first day efforts, and how well he bowled to deserve the wickets, likewise I SAW Monty, rather than read about it and attacked him.

Scaly piscine said:
Anyone can tell you who knows a bit about cricket that what ends up in that wicket column is a lot down to luck. The stumping and the Inzi wicket were lucky, a good few of the dismissals were simply rubbish shots (or leaves).
Yes, and Jack made comments to that effect.

But as I said, how much of Monty did you SEE to make these comments?
 

greg

International Debutant
Scaly piscine said:
That's fine if you're up against Shahid Afridi or West Indies, but most of the time batsmen won't make those mistakes and that's why you've got Vettori averaging 35 and Giles 40. These mistakes are just as likely to come against someone else as they are a spinner anyway.
Collingwood's just unlucky, I guess ;)
 

greg

International Debutant
Scaly piscine said:
But of course while he doesn't have a doosra and doesn't play home games in India then he's going to head towards 35...
Why does he need a doosra? Shane Warne doesn't have one.
 

silentstriker

The Wheel is Forever
greg said:
Why does he need a doosra? Shane Warne doesn't have one.

Ummmm....becase Shane Warne isn't an offspiner? Doosra is a delivery that goes from leg to off, bowled using a similar action as other off spin deliveries. Leg spinners don't need the doosra because their deliveries already go from leg to off.
 
Last edited:

Top