Just referring to his Goweresque (not) techniqueTTBoy said:I presume your taking the ****?
Just referring to his Goweresque (not) techniqueTTBoy said:I presume your taking the ****?
Still ignoring the incidents he's had with other sides who aren't from the subcontinent because that would ruin the racist claims I see...silentstriker said:The term racist does not relate to only this incident - this is just the latest (and hopefully final) incident in a long and storied career with subcontinent teams.
YMS actually caught sight of him running between overs...SpaceMonkey said:If ever there was a cricketer not suited for Twenty20 its Inzi.
Lies!marc71178 said:YMS actually caught sight of him running between overs...
Well it was only because they could have been penalised 6 runs, which would have meant he'd have had to bother to hit Gough for another 6 at some point.SpaceMonkey said:Lies!
Mark#### let me tell this to you politely .... You are not and never have been "The sharpest Knife in the Cupboard"marc71178 said:Still ignoring the incidents he's had with other sides who aren't from the subcontinent because that would ruin the racist claims I see...
marc71178 said:Still ignoring the incidents he's had with other sides who aren't from the subcontinent because that would ruin the racist claims I see...
That's partly because any time Hair makes a decision against an Asian side a lot of people like you automically say it's because he's racist, or someone in said Asian side will go off in a huff like Inzy did - most of these 'incidents' are remembered purely because someone has gone and got themselves a fine. In the end paranoia fuels even more paranoia.silentstriker said:The number of non-subcontinent incidents are dwarfed by the incidents against subcontinent teams.
I am sure no one knows more about it than you do.Scaly piscine said:In the end paranoia fuels even more paranoia.
Sanz said:I am sure no one knows more about it than you do.
Oh really, because the Cricinfo article I read detailing the 2 umpires (because people still ignore Doctrove) controversies suggested something different - I think there was one in it, and one of them was SA complaining about Hair favouring Pakistan...silentstriker said:The number of non-subcontinent incidents are dwarfed by the incidents against subcontinent teams.
marc71178 said:Oh really, because the Cricinfo article I read detailing the 2 umpires (because people still ignore Doctrove) controversies suggested something different - I think there was one in it, and one of them was SA complaining about Hair favouring Pakistan...
Mind you, why should that ruin a good witch-hunt?
Do you actually watch any cricket or what?marc71178 said:Still ignoring the incidents he's had with other sides who aren't from the subcontinent because that would ruin the racist claims I see...
That's one of the stupidest posts I've read.silentstriker said:Maybe he hates black people more than asians?
Awesome. Thanks.Pedro Delgado said:It's a D/N job so it'll be starting later.
I can't see anything about it at CricInfo...they probably decided that most people wouldn't care about the awards with all the furore.stumpski said:This thread has grown by about 50 pages since I last checked ... Going back to the Oval Test, does anyone know if the match and series awards were ever given out? If not there are medals and a bottle of champers or two gathering dust somewhere. In England there is a player of the series for each side, chosen by the manager of the opposing team - a nice touch at the end of a series. But no-one expected the series to end like this!