Not when 5 of them are gone inside 41 overs.Eng are 4 wickets down and there are still so much batting to come. Must get tiring for the bowling team
that's the thing, they are 5 down and it still feels like that half the batting is still around (which it almost is)Not when 5 of them are gone inside 41 overs.
How about 158-5 then?50-2 after the first hour doesn't make it a good decision. Particularly as Pakistan have Hales on toast as soon as the ball does anything, and Root played a pretty crap shot, and Pakistan actually held two catches.
To bowl first you really have to get a 50-100 run lead to compensate for batting last, when you could have had England batting last v Yasir Shah.
This is not really true when Stokes is not in the side.England bat freaking deep
it is still true, heck Broad bats at 9 and even he is almost an al rounder.This is not really true when Stokes is not in the side.
As we learned during the last Test, Scaly's scrabble knowledge and subsequent attached expertise in game theory means his own opinion is the only barometer by which decisions can be declared good or badHow about 158-5 then?
fixedAs we learned during the last Test, Scaly's scrabble knowledge and subsequent attached expertise in game theory means his own opinion is the only barometer by which declarations can be declared good or bad
Yeah, 4 years ago maybe, stop gambhiring it's getting annoying, we've got this partnership and Woakes to get us a passable-to-good score, and Moeen's not exactly mr consistency.it is still true, heck Broad bats at 9 and even he is almost an al rounder.
Yeah, 4 years ago maybe, stop gambhiring it's getting annoying, we've got this partnership and Woakes to get us a passable-to-good score, and Moeen's not exactly mr consistency.
I would love to gambhir but this is not one of those occasions.Yes Broad's getting a nosebleed at 9 these days.
Over rate is abysmal.is Pakistan's over rate really bad or the match was delayed or something?