I agree had he possessed a middle order like Waugh, Lehmann, Glichrist, Hussey (Prime) he could be excused for playing extravagant shots like those and getting out. However Australian middle order is the most fragile in the last 10-15 years and hence Ponting has to show some responsibility even if it means curbing his attacking shots. As I said before Australia needs Ponting the batsman now more than ever. They would prefer a 225 ball 100 from him rather than a 50 ball 40 even if the latter was "awesome, and aggressive".ponting played as he usually does - in an attacking manner. the ball was there to be hit and i've seen him dispatch similiar deliveries, first up, to the boundary
ponting's kinda built the foundation of his batting on aggressive intent and counter-attacks, as befits a player of his stature. defending that delivery would kinda require a very fundamental shift in his approach to batting and that's not a decision he'd take lightly. sure he could pull a steve waugh and shut shop from now on but that's not something you'd expect from him and rightfully so
sami's spell wasn't great. at best it was mildly threatening and that's more a function of the basic tools he possesses as a fast bowler coupled with the pitch conditions, as opposed to any 'intent' on his part. of course this is kinda irrelevant if ye reckon the ends justify the means no matter what the actual reality is but sami's spell here was the opposite end of the spectrum to a performance like, say, wasim akram's against england in faisalabad circa 2000 or roach's spell earlier in the season - brilliant bowling with little to show for itOk this is pretty ridiculous commenting needless criticism..... That was a GREAT spell!
meh, i see yer point but i disagree with ye - ponting's approach to batting kinda typifies the aussie approach to cricket during their dominant era and i really dont see the aussie teams of future being able to rekindle that dominance if they dont carry over the dominant, counter-attacking spirit that led to knocks like gilchrists against pakistan, for example into the current aussie team in transitionI agree had he possessed a middle order like Waugh, Lehmann, Glichrist, Hussey (Prime) he could be excused for playing extravagant shots like those and getting out. However Australian middle order is the most fragile in the last 10-15 years and hence Ponting has to show some responsibility even if it means curbing his attacking shots. As I said before Australia needs Ponting the batsman now more than ever. They would prefer a 225 ball 100 from him rather than a 50 ball 40 even if the latter was "awesome, and aggressive".
I'd kill for a golf swing follow-through as pure as that on MJ's cover drive.Johnson playing and missing 50 times. Luck has turned. 150+ here we come.
Fair enough assessment in the long term however short term blips require adjustments from top players. I am not saying Ponting has "lost" his pull shot but merely that he is out of form and in the inevitable decline. Hence his pull shot is getting him out more times than actually it should be. Sachin tendulkar went through a similar phase in the 2003-04 series to Australia. He was then plagued by his injury and bad form and was getting out repeatedly to deliveries outside off, which he would have smashed in his prime. He made the short term adjustment by dropping the cover drive and the cut altogether in the last test match at Sydney in which he scored 240 odd with 70% runs coming from the leg side. Agreed it was not "enjoyable" and "entertaining" as his other hundreds in Australia, but in the final analysis he scored runs for himself, team and ended a series of disappointing scores. That is what Ponting can take a leaf out of. Of course Tendulkar is playing the cut and the drive now as usual.meh, i see yer point but i disagree with ye - ponting's approach to batting kinda typifies the aussie approach to cricket during their dominant era and i really dont see the aussie teams of future being able to rekindle that dominance if they dont carry over the dominant, counter-attacking spirit that led to knocks like gilchrists against pakistan, for example into the current aussie team in transition
or else there'd be a return to dogged mediocrity
If that wasn't the kiss of death I don't know what was. Your timing was excellent.Johnson and Hauritz showing the batsmen how its done.
What do you reckon, good odds for most wickets in Pakistan's 1st dig?Warm up Dougy.
Dougeh.