Johnners
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Don't know what you're on about, it's am47ing 8|Have you seen our batting?
Don't know what you're on about, it's am47ing 8|Have you seen our batting?
Yeah it's pretty rank admittedly. Very interesting to see how Cowan, Warner, Khawaja/Marsh (?) shape up over the next year.Have you seen our batting?
These players got us to number 1, they lost us this match, they should get themselves back into it. If they can. Only change I might make is Monty in for Tremlett who looked pretty ordinary here if they think they need 2 spinners.The important thing is that we don't overreact to this. And I'm sure we won't, but I imagine there will be calls for a few heads over the next few days and it's important that Flower & Strauss keep a cool head.
If getting a pulse in your tide means getting magical clairvoyance of the distant future then yes of course your signs are vitalI think when you've been following the game for a while, you get to have a pulse for certain changes in tide around the cricketing globe. The Australian bowling lineup is on the up and up, and will wreck English batting in those tailor made conditions next year. They've been playing a horrible India, no doubt, but the signs are vital and there to see for all but the most obtuse.
You are a TROLL, I claim my £5.I think when you've been following the game for a while, you get to have a pulse for certain changes in tide around the cricketing globe. The Australian bowling lineup is on the up and up, and will wreck English batting in those tailor made conditions next year. They've been playing a horrible India, no doubt, but the signs are vital and there to see for all but the most obtuse.
Watto will replace either Cowan or Marsh tbh.Yeah it's pretty rank admittedly. Very interesting to see how Cowan, Warner, Khawaja/Marsh (?) shape up over the next year.
So then you'd be at -1 reviews thenThat is what you use reviews on.
Nothing shamanic about it; if all the Aussie bowlers are fit and it comes to a bowling crapshoot between the two sides, Australia win. Simple.If getting a pulse in your tide means getting magical clairvoyance of the distant future then yes of course your signs are vital
Absolutely agreed. The point about premeditation is spot on IMO.RE: Bell being such a good player of spin, I disagree.
His answer, especially early on in his or the bowler's innings, is to head down the wicket and try to bomb him straight back over his head. He plays the shot well, then guys go back and he's happy to pick them off for singles, almost one day style and pounce on anything shorter. Was especially good at it in Australia, when he was taking down Doherty and Beer.
But when he's not confident enough to be doing that, he gets stuck on the crease much more, and has to rely on his little paddle sweep. There's too much premeditation in his game to get away with it against the top class spinners.
EDIT: not saying he's bad, just wouldn't be building him up as much as others have been here.
A convict, hence it was given.Just saw the Strauss dismissal, it came off the hip. Why give it out when there was no hot spot? I'm confused. Who is the video review umpire?
Looked pretty good in real timeSo then you'd be at -1 reviews then