cric_manic
First Class Debutant
i hope marshall gets it,that was an outstanding inningsLoony BoB said:McGrath MOM surely...
i hope marshall gets it,that was an outstanding inningsLoony BoB said:McGrath MOM surely...
We did not play utter crap. Styris, Astle, Cairns and Vettori bowled very well, on a wicket that suited their type of bowling.MoxPearl said:We played like crap aswell.. infact we played like utter crap
What a foolish comment!!!!cric_manic said:shows up a few weakneses in the aussies team and shows that they can crumble under pressure
also that umpires are intimidated by the australians
And you said Australia wouldent win a match in this serieseastley said:It's the truth, our batting in the last 4 matches has not been the best and without Glenn McGrath, Australia would of lost a lot more matches.
I was replying to the guy saying that aussie played crap.Ming said:We did not play utter crap. Styris, Astle, Cairns and Vettori bowled very well, on a wicket that suited their type of bowling.
Man, some of your posts are frustrating to read. Oh we "played utter crap" when we came within 10 runs of beating the World Champions....
We should have won that game, god knows what Vettori was thinking though. He could have just pushed for ones when it was 13 off 13.
As good an innings as it was, you can't take it away from McGrath. 4 for 16 off 9.4 overs makes him easily the one man who made the difference in my opinion. Replace his eco rate (1.66) with some other Aussie bowler's eco rate (say, 3.00, which is still good) and NZ would have won the match. It was his bowling, easily, that won the game.cric_manic said:i hope marshall gets it,that was an outstanding innings
You won the game so you can't have played terribly. Better to admit that it was a close game and both teams played well then patronise the other team by saying you played terribly and still won.eastley said:It's the truth, our batting in the last 4 matches has not been the best and without Glenn McGrath, Australia would of lost a lot more matches.
I'm hoping that by your 's you're joking.Scallywag said:And you said Australia wouldent win a match in this series
NZ only got close because of a blind third umpire and showed thier true colors by throwing things at the players, pathetic display by the NZ crowd.
I can't believe people are saying the teams played like crap. You have to blame the pitch for the type of batting you saw today. It was low, slow and not coming on - it was a grinding type wicket - the sort of wicket if you batted on in a test you might expect 200 -250 in a day. To try to come in and smash from the start is very hard, thats why you saw lots of wickets fall.MoxPearl said:We played like crap aswell.. infact we played like utter crap
You're an idiotScallywag said:And you said Australia wouldent win a match in this series
NZ only got close because of a blind third umpire and showed thier true colors by throwing things at the players, pathetic display by the NZ crowd.
Amen!Fiery said:You won the game so you can't have played terribly. Better to admit that it was a close game and both teams played well then patronise the other team by saying you played terribly and still won.
I couldn't watch the game (I was checking cricinfo here and there), but it seems like Lee is getting remarkably little credit here for the victory - I certainly felt the game was as good as gone until Lee shattered Vettori's stumps. He has been great at the death in recent matches.Jono said:I just think its worth mentioning that Brett Lee bowled quite well tonight, compared to Kapsrowicz who once again got smashed by the Kiwis.
I can't believe Australia have the luxury of 'dropping' Gillespie.
But we certainly weren't "utter crap".MoxPearl said:u really think we were at our best in that game ? no way
I said Struggle to win, which tonight we won but struggled to do it, and we will continue to struggle through out the series.Scallywag said:And you said Australia wouldent win a match in this series
If NZ had won - I'm sure he would got it. But McGrath's was the match winning performance.cric_manic said:i hope marshall gets it,that was an outstanding innings
Why is that Bob do you think the umpires were intimidated by the Aussies.Loony BoB said:I'm hoping that by your 's you're joking.
Exactly. McGrath deserved MOMmavric41 said:If NZ had won - I'm sure he would got it. But McGrath's was the match winning performance.
I never meant to patronise NZ, I said in a earlier post that a few silly mistakes lost them the match and other than that they deserved to win, they bowled and batted better than us.Fiery said:You won the game so you can't have played terribly. Better to admit that it was a close game and both teams played well then patronise the other team by saying you played terribly and still won.