oz_fan
International Regular
Yeah he did. I'll edit._Ed_ said:De Villiers played a rather important innings in the first test.
Last edited:
Yeah he did. I'll edit._Ed_ said:De Villiers played a rather important innings in the first test.
Prince and Rudolph both played well in Australia, and Prince did well in South Africa against the Australians as well. Gibbs has been decidedly ordinary for a while. I still don't understand the logic in him opening recently though, considering he was clearly struggling against any movement in towards him at all.oz_fan said:Yet they continue to stick with Smith who has failed all summer. You would think by now that the SA selectors would either drop him from the team so he can regain his form or take away the responsibility of being captain. Kallis did an ok job in the third test against Australia, maybe that is the better option for SA.
Even Gibbs has failed throughout the year in tests so have many SA batsmen (Gibbs, Prince, Smith, Rudolph). I am suprised that they continue to stick with Prince when Gibbs is an experienced member of the team. Anyway at least they have made some changes. It will be good to see how Amla goes.
It was pitiful. And I'm really surprised there hasn't been much talk of it on this forum. Innovation is sending out McCullum to attack, which we know he can do. It might have been slighty more acceptable if Mills had a history of blunting attacks at international level, but he doesn't. He simply does not have the skills to bat in that situation. Even if he did, he's never done it before. Fleming, however, does.Blaze said:It was a good move IMO. It's called innovation.
Edit - and I don't know why you have such an issue with Fleming. He is our most successful captain ever. God knows what would have happened if he hadn't taken over in 97...
Man, you really don't rate him, do you?Macka said:Kill Mills
That is ludicrus. It is not as if we have top order batsmen queeing up behind Fleming and pushing hard to take his place. Sure there is Sinclair and Vincent but neither of those guys deserve to take the place of the captain of New Zealand.Macka said:Fleming has done a good job in the past with the team. And we shouldn't lose sight of that. (Well, I shouldn't... maybe.) But now is not '97. We do have the talent in the team to win without Fleming there; I don't think we should just accept Fleming's place in the side or as captain.
I know, made even more incredible by the fact that SA are totally on top of NZJono said:From hero to zero in the space of a month and a bit.
He scores that match-winning 175 in the record 434 chase, and then is dropped from the test side. Amazing.
Woohoo! Marshall might not be playing!Hamish Marshall's accustomed spot, opening the batting for New Zealand is in jeopardy, because of the ribcage rattling he took in the first test.
New Zealand practices again tomorrow with Michael Papps and Jamie How on stand-by for the second test against the Proteas, starting on Thursday in Cape Town.
Meanwhile Shane Bond's fitness is looking grim; his knee needs to be able to handle some rigorous testing before he will give it the thumbs up.
He says he now wants to have a couple of heavy days on it to give it a testing workout.
However, the dodgy knees of Nathan Astle and James Franklin have now been given the all clear.
When he's dead.sirjeremy11 said:when is enough enough?
Next time you see Martin, just don't rub it in.mundaneyogi said:Yogi raises his bat to acknowledge the deafening applause for his triple century![]()
Agreed. I think even when he was injured for two years, people were saying "Wait until we get Bond back!", and he had only played about 10 tests.sideshowtim said:new zealand need bond. there is no doubt about that. he is by far the finest bowler to come from NZ since hadlee although he lets them down so much with injuries it's ridiculous. they rely a bit too heavily on him i believe....
graeme smith better watch himself. for someone who has been promotoed as south africa's best since pollock he's had a very lean run against the world quality bowling attack of australia. his captaincy isn't good enough to justify a place in the team for that alone like fleming is.Prince EWS said:SOUTH AFRICAN BATTING AVERAGES SINCE THE BEGINNING OF THE TOUR TO AUSTRALIA
AJ Hall - 58 runs in 2 innings @ 58.00.
JH Kallis - 520 runs in 12 innings @ 47.27.
JM Kemp - 62 runs in 2 innings @ 31.00.
SM Pollock - 273 runs in 11 innings @ 30.33.
HH Dippenaar - 120 runs in 4 innings @ 30.00.
AG Prince - 411 runs in 14 innings @ 29.36.
AB de Villiers - 403 runs in 14 innings @ 28.79.
MV Boucher - 333 runs in 14 innings @ 27.75.
JA Rudolph - 294 runs in 12 innings @ 26.73.
HH Gibbs - 372 runs in 14 innings @ 26.57.
N Boje - 225 runs in 10 innings @ 25.00.
GC Smith - 282 runs in 12 innings @ 23.50.
DW Steyn - 20 runs in 2 innings @ 20.00.
A Nel - 91 runs in 10 innings @ 11.38.
M Ntini - 64 runs in 11 innings @ 9.14.
CK Langeveldt - 1 runs in 2 innings @ 1.00.
Gibbs's dropping really doesn't seem unjustified to me at all.
sideshowtim said:his captaincy isn't good enough to justify a place in the team for that alone like fleming is.
Especially if they start to drop more players. I think he was lucky to escape being dropped for the team this time instead of Gibbs when you consider Gibbs has been in the team longer and they already have a replacement for captain (Kallis). He really needs a big score in the next match to cement his place.sideshowtim said:graeme smith better watch himself. for someone who has been promotoed as south africa's best since pollock he's had a very lean run against the world quality bowling attack of australia. his captaincy isn't good enough to justify a place in the team for that alone like fleming is.