Jono said:DeVilliers in the middle order coming in at 6, very interesting.
If NZ can scalp one more, particularly Kallis, they'll be on top and in a very good position.
Richard said:Yes, we would - because whether you like it or not SA are infinately stronger than both NZ and WI.
Yeah, just odd that they didn't drop Dippenaar. Still, neither are that impressive, I suppose._Ed_ said:Rudolph was dropped to let Smith back in.
That's true. I think it was de Villiers that came into the squad to replace Smith for the last match actually, and he's slid down the order.Samuel_Vimes said:Yeah, just odd that they didn't drop Dippenaar. Still, neither are that impressive, I suppose.
No AB played in all the game's against Australia (opening in every game), Dippenaar was Smith's replacement for the third test match at Johannesburg._Ed_ said:That's true. I think it was de Villiers that came into the squad to replace Smith for the last match actually, and he's slid down the order.
Before reading this please be assured I am not trying to flame and would appreciate an honest answer.Blaze said:I agree with what someone else said earlier in the thread - Mills continues to improve.
Bracewell cops a lot of flack but you have to give him some credit for sticking with MIlls and developing him.
Flamer!!!Goughy said:Before reading this please be assured I am not trying to flame and would appreciate an honest answer.
After watching todays play (I don't get the opportunity to watch NZ too often) I seemed to notice that Mills throws a couple of balls. I will watch much closer tomorrow, but (I have only seen it once) the ball that got Pollock looked dubious.
Has this issue been mentioned before?
Anyway, highlights are on in 10 mins and Ill edit the post if things look different on second viewing.
After watching the highlightsGoughy said:Anyway, highlights are on in 10 mins and Ill edit the post if things look different on second viewing.