tooextracool
International Coach
that doesnt say much about strauss does it?look if courteney walsh batted left handed he would still be a good enough replacement for trescothick.Arjun said:He was once named as Trescothick's best replacement.
that doesnt say much about strauss does it?look if courteney walsh batted left handed he would still be a good enough replacement for trescothick.Arjun said:He was once named as Trescothick's best replacement.
marc71178 said:And of course those extra analysts will be so useful when a team only has 10 fit players because of injuries.
Are they packing their kit?
Lions81 said:I gotta go with talent over form anyday. You know Bond and Astle can do it and have done it in the past, so you gotta trust that they can do it again, unless they aren't fit or are done in terms of being too old, etc. If they're fit and in their prime, you gotta trust them more than some other players.
Oh yes, I distinctly remember Walsh's career average in the 40's and his double centuries.tooextracool said:that doesnt say much about strauss does it?look if courteney walsh batted left handed he would still be a good enough replacement for trescothick.
Hey, Fleming's known for making the most of people who are considered unknowns in the world!luckyeddie said:Well, if Hawkeye can replace umpires, I'm sure that the videotape man can keep wicket.
Not all analysts of course; physios, psychologists, etc.!marc71178 said:And of course those extra analysts will be so useful when a team only has 10 fit players because of injuries.
Are they packing their kit?
Kent said:Really though, 4 injuries at once?
What a ridiculous thing to say. He doesn't need to be left-handed at all.tooextracool said:that doesnt say much about strauss does it?look if courteney walsh batted left handed he would still be a good enough replacement for trescothick.
No, either way he wouldn't be as good a player as Banger is.Lions81 said:What a ridiculous thing to say. He doesn't need to be left-handed at all.
Marc, a sense of humor please?marc71178 said:No, either way he wouldn't be as good a player as Banger is.
Thrope gave ODIs away to try and spend more time with his children. And plus if he wont bearound for 2007, is there any point having him in there?Arjun said:Thorpe is not in the plans (for some strange reason)
Fair enough, after a potential career ending injury, you can understand him bowling at that pace.Tim said:Craig, while I was in Christchurch 2 weeks ago I went and watched the 1st ODI out at Lincoln & Bond was bowling brisk medium pace. From what I can gather he will be able to return to fast bowling. He's just doing things caustiously at this stage.
How about to win matches now? It's not all about the World Cup. There are actual matches which count in between them.Craig said:Thrope gave ODIs away to try and spend more time with his children. And plus if he wont bearound for 2007, is there any point having him in there?
meatspx said:It's hard to see Bond taking wickets if he doesn't have his greatest weapon - pace.
If he is 100% fit till 2007, why not play him? He's far better than all those ODI specialist batsmen picked in the recent England teams.And plus if he wont bearound for 2007, is there any point having him in there?