As I feared, we're back to the full-cream milk being dished up by Vettori and Styris these days. It'll be embarrassing if Fleming goes back to this tactic in the tests (the Barmy Army would work on a chant), but it's nice that Vettori's given us prior warning he'll be in the starting XI.Loony BoB said:Meanwhile, Kent (the county team) are on 109/0. Sigh.
Okay everyone, here's another: Will NZ take a wicket? I'm guessing no. *dies*Rich2001 said:Update:
Kent 161/0 @ Lunch - What is the point really of taking lunch here? With just over 20 runs to finish the game.
R.Key 94*
D.Fulton 63*
Well if they continue to not Bowl Bond then i doubt itLoony BoB said:Okay everyone, here's another: Will NZ take a wicket? I'm guessing no. *dies*
tooextracool said:why is giles a certainity though?i think his record in england speak for himself....id rather have collingwood,strauss or maybe even another fast bowler in there instead of him
tooextracool said:i am surprised anderson got picked.....IMO hes not good enough to be part of the squad. i find it hard to understand why giles is in there either...i think his average on home soil leaves a lot to be desired
ive also heard that jones' keeping wasnt quite upto the mark in the kent vs NZ game?
Kent said:Plus we've drawn 7 of our last 11 tests that weren't on joke pitches, and even the reborn English side don't exactly strike me as an early-series aggressor.
Twice in one match!tooextracool said:its just insult when rob key smashes you around like that...
Put your house on it....twctopcat said:Is there a chance for Key if he has an Ed Smith '03 season? Was never too keen on the chubmeister but if he continues this form.....