yeah that seems to be a problem with him,something that we'll see quite a bit from him in his career......he just tends to get a bit carried away from the bounce he gets and bowls it too short. its something that caddick used to do very often as well.PY said:Harmison is on the money again, as soon as he realised that you need to pitch the bloody thing up.
Took him 5 overs though.
wasnt really a spectacular ball though, sloppy footwork from richardson, failing to get his foot to the pitch of the ball.twctopcat said:Bowled him!!!!!!
Saggers you legend, Richardson out!!!!
thank god you got rid of that obnoxious rob key avatarRich2001 said:Myself inculding have been saying that spinners will play no part in this match, but iam starting to wonder now.
The area has been very wet of late and the pitch has been under covers for a long long time in the last week or so and it's made the surface pretty damp and the bowlers footmarks after just over an hour are very very prominate, anyone who lands the ball in them will certianly get grip.
NZ lose their first wicket! - Oh and now Hoggard has just had a edge dropped, was a sitter too That's three drops now already and it's starting to look like a TV reply of the Bang v WI Test match where everything is dropped!
And to top it all off rain is in the air it seems
Have to agree, who can they replace him with? He's too much of a liability for my liking.tooextracool said:we've seen enough evidence in the last test and in the WI that butcher is a horrible,horrible slip fielder
Agree here with Eddie, the Butcher catch was very hard... diving forward at full lenght in the slips is one of the least favourite things to do as any slip fielder will tell you.luckyeddie said:The Thorpe catch was a dolly, the Butcher one exceedingly difficult.
that really is the problem....both thorpe and butcher arent exactly 'reliable' slip fielders and that leaves just tres and flintoff.twctopcat said:Have to agree, who can they replace him with? He's too much of a liability for my liking.
Yes, I didn't think we'd have an injury so late in the day.a massive zebra said:I'm afraid you're mistaken Sir
I wouldn't trust Cricinfo's word on much...Loony BoB said:Cricinfo: It has been confirmed by Clive Lloyd, the match referee, that if Vaughan has to make a mad dash to hospital, he will be able to bat in any position on his return.
I always said he should be in the teamPY said:Saggers first ball: BOWLED HIM
You can trust mine though - I heard the interview with Simon Taufel before the toss of the coin - and it was said then.marc71178 said:I wouldn't trust Cricinfo's word on much...
I lost my anger about that when I realised just about every fringe NZ player is in the UK anyway. The perils of being the second or third-favourite sport in a country of only 4 million people is probably more accurate. (if it weren't for Canterbury's dry summer climate, we'd be lucky to have the cricket depth of Wales!)marc71178 said:Although it's actually a weaker attack as Oram can't bowl in the match!
The perils of a 14 man squad with injury doubts included in the 14!
I'll doubt he would have bothered to be honest, he has just spent the previous day making the trek up the map, and had he gone he would have had about a 6 hour drive traffic depending getting back meaning he would only just be getting to the ground by about now and we have been bowling for over a hour and a half now.marc71178 said:Yes, I didn't think we'd have an injury so late in the day.
If all were fit he wouldn't have had a chance, but would've been able to go back and bowl for Kent as they try to defend 600+!