You'd imagine they would, but so would you in 1994, 1998 and 2003.England did the job but to be totally honest are a very average side IMO and were just lucky to play a side that don't have the mental application or the skill for test cricket. I will be very suprised if South Africa don't win the up and coming test series.
Have two - J and E. RJED is my email, after all.What's your middle initial Dicky? I was thinking of referring to you in this way
R D or possibly D D (not V D)
More then what we did when we were over therePrecisely my point - although slight clarification, they beat SA in the a test and lost the series
Ahhhhh! It all becomes clear! You are George LucasHave two - J and E. RJED is my email, after all.
I'd honestly never noticed that before, in about 10 years since first watching that film. Good spot.Ahhhhh! It all becomes clear! You are George Lucas
RJED ---> Return of the JEDi
??
Your much easier to please than I.Disagree with the above strongly. This is a strong collective unit that just needs to click, while not on par with England, Australia, India and SA, we're at least with the rest.
We have some good Test players in How, Taylor, McCullum, Oram, Vettori, Martin, Mills, and dare I say it O'Brien. Players like Flynn, Fulton and Ryder all have the potential to strengthen our squad and we almost beat England both at home and away.
This series as a whole was by no means a disappointment, we came close and failed against a better team. I think you'd be hard pressed to expect more from almost any New Zealand team in history. I'm as disappointed as anyone with this match, but its more to great English batting and bowling than any real downfall from our players. Redmond and McCullum got absolute gems in the first innings, and Pietersen played a great knock. If players like Pietersen or Anderson on a good day (1/8th of the time) get going then we're always going to be well behind.
I take a lot of pride in having players like Taylor, McCullum, Vettori, Oram, Vettori and Southee who on their own days can put the opposition into this kind of position. Its just whether the other players in the team can assist them like the English team do until we can really expect any semblance of success in the greatest form of the game.
In the shorter form however...
Lets kick these Pommie bastards arses.
Not happy but realistic, our team was never likely to do well in this series. We ended up doing okay, fair enough. Bit disheartened and feel like Christmas was cancelled but at least Easter (the ODI's) is still on.Your much easier to please than I.
He accepts the inevitable a hell of alot better than you too.Your much easier to please than I.
AWTA, but I think we should allow Bell or Papps to compete for the opening slot as well.I feel sorry for Redmond. He had a solid NZ domestic season, and 2 centuries in warm ups and received a number of aboslutely superb deliveries. His output was not top class though. However, I think he should be perservered with for another series. I want us looking forward with our openers. Going back to Bell or promoting/retrying Marshall would be a poor move.
Lol.No Ryder is an issue. Who's going to open with McCullum (god its refreshing to see McCullum open for some reason).
I can't see how being in a winning position in the second test, yet losing, and then possibly losing by an innings in the third test doesn't equate to a disappointing series.This series as a whole was by no means a disappointment