Not sure, 7 assuming we require quick runs. I know it's stating the bleeding obvious, but so much on this KW/Taylor partnership.Santner at 6 or 7.
The backlash caused by England scoring a dismal 302 has begun. Changes must be made for the next match or another paltry score is in the offing.
Cook would see them through to the 50 over mark. I mean 200 not all out is better than 300 and you lose all the wickets. No chance of a draw there.
They are, or at least Root, Buttler and Morgan are, who we already knew would be part of the side for a fair bit longer.Eh? They're playing better here than the World Cup...
Quite so. Roy is a lucky boy to be playing international cricket given his domestic track record, but maybe he'll justify the call. It's still early days of course.They are, or at least Root, Buttler and Morgan are, who we already knew would be part of the side for a fair bit longer.
I've mostly just decided I don't really rate Jason Roy and I think the link between picking meh players like that and the batting order suddenly being better is spurious.
Those guys all moving up the order is to me the big difference. Would still swap Stokes and Buttler around, but it's better than before. The new guys, Rashid's big game aside, haven't done much yet as far as I can tell. Thought Willey should have been given first go at 7 instead of BillingsThey are, or at least Root, Buttler and Morgan are, who we already knew would be part of the side for a fair bit longer.
I've mostly just decided I don't really rate Jason Roy and I think the link between picking meh players like that and the batting order suddenly being better is spurious.
They are, or at least Root, Buttler and Morgan are, who we already knew would be part of the side for a fair bit longer.
I've mostly just decided I don't really rate Jason Roy and I think the link between picking meh players like that and the batting order suddenly being better is spurious.
It's the lad look, Stokes seems to fit the part.What is with Stokes shirt collar? Is it defective?