The current crop of teenagers are those that benefited from the improved funding/coaching from 99 onwards once International status came about. The majority of older players (Rafique, Bashar, Mashud excepted) are no better than the kids.Craig said:And hopefully a five wicket haul for him.
What's with Bangladesh's practice of picking teenagers in their XIs, is it really that bleak for them?
even tho' Wiseman reportedly bowled well as a foil for Vettori & took 3 wickets and a run out, I still feel his 64 runs are very expensive for the #2 spinner in the team - unless it was a part timer...........Mingster said:I see no need for Wiseman either Anzac, I think Marshall will have to play the 2nd Test. Otherwise there is no real point in bringing him over.
Neil Pickup said:The current crop of teenagers are those that benefited from the improved funding/coaching from 99 onwards once International status came about. The majority of older players (Rafique, Bashar, Mashud excepted) are no better than the kids.
yep - a victory by an innings & 99 runs inside 4 days is good enough for me...........what the comparisson to others that have toured there recently - ENG????Tim said:Agreed...Vettori was outstanding. Even though it was Bangladesh, he still would have troubled most sides with the loop & dip he was getting.
McCullum took his opportunities unlike the rest so well done to him on scoring a century.
Might I add, that NZ are only doing enough to win this test...it hasn't been outstanding cricket.
hasn't it been his movement thru the air that's been missing untill now?????JASON said:Even if its against Bangladesh, one hopes it can restore his confidence in his bowling and be a sign of his return to being the wicket taker he once was for NZ.
I'm a fan for him in the longer game - but so far as I'm aware his stats suck in limited overs & not just ODIs...........unless ENG signalled a BIIIG turn around.......shaka said:Franklin will do well in ODI's if he does replace Tuffey.
I don't think I've really seen enough of him on quality tracks or against quality bowlers to put labels on him yet.anzac said:this may be slightly out of context, but what sort of a batsman is Fulton????
I know he's tall and bats in the top order, but is he good technically? does he use his height to get over the ball & play shots, or does he use his reach & leverage to try & get under it??????
if he's the former & thinking of his contributions in RSA - he may be suited to batting in AUS conditions....................