I was taking the piss. Hence the wink smiley. Its a humorous reference to comments made by some kiwi posters, including myself, before the 3rd ODI about how some Australian posters were not giving any credit to the NZ team for outperforming them. Pasag, rightly, pulled me up on it. My comment reverses that on its head, thats all.I don't get what the big fuss is about (assuming you're not taking the piss). The 2 non LBWs (Ponting & Ferguson) were absolutely garbage calls, but Ponting ended up playing a rubbish innings anyway, and the game was over when the Ferguson call was made. They were hardly game changing. You lost because of poor batting and M Hussey.
Sounds like my dad...When Flynn lost his teeth to that Anderson bouncer he kept going on about how bouncers should be banned and the bowler should be fined
He couldnt understand it was a good delivery and part and parcel of the game.
I would agree that NZ lost the game more than we won it (as opposed to the previous game) and aside from Michael Clarke, our bowling was pretty ordinary.I was taking the piss. Hence the wink smiley. Its a humorous reference to comments made by some kiwi posters, including myself, before the 3rd ODI about how some Australian posters were not giving any credit to the NZ team for outperforming them. Pasag, rightly, pulled me up on it. My comment reverses that on its head, thats all.
Edit/ Humour does not travel well on the internet. Especially when its dry.![]()
Ahh fair call thenI was taking the piss. Hence the wink smiley. Its a humorous reference to comments made by some kiwi posters, including myself, before the 3rd ODI about how some Australian posters were not giving any credit to the NZ team for outperforming them. Pasag, rightly, pulled me up on it. My comment reverses that on its head, thats all.
Edit/ Humour does not travel well on the internet. Especially when its dry.![]()
Guptill was poor, no denying that, he's been poor all series really. I'm only cutting him slack becasue he's 22 and doesn't usually get bogged down like that.
I will say this for Cumming though, whoever picked him a 6 needs a punch in the face. Was completely unfair. He could have made more of it though.
.
Bingo.The 3/17 lost them the game, not the start.
Its amazing how money influences the game of cricket. If Australia did what india did last year, Steve Bucknor would have been suspended for his umpiring and their would be burning effigies of him out in the streets throughout australia.
Still a fireban in Victoria, ITBT...Its amazing how money influences the game of cricket. If Australia did what india did last year, Steve Bucknor would have been suspended for his umpiring and their would be burning effigies of him out in the streets throughout australia.
I would agree that NZ lost the game more than we won it (as opposed to the previous game) and aside from Michael Clarke, our bowling was pretty ordinary.
This is exactly why it was rather ill thought out that people were saying that the Aussie Test side don't need to pick a spinner and that Symonds/Clarke can just fill in with overs. Making them do more, especially something as strenuous as bowling, costs the team eventually.Though that seems to have come at some cost, Clarke is now in doubt for the series decider.
Given Clarke history of back problems, he shouldn't have been made to bowl this many number of overs every game, this is probably the last thing Australia would have wanted going into such an important game, it would be a huge blow to the already fragile Aussie top-order if he doesn't play.
Can't say he will be missed hugely, going by his performances over the last 14 months. Who will be the replacement batsman?Though that seems to have come at some cost, Clarke is now in doubt for the series decider.
Given Clarke history of back problems, he shouldn't have been made to bowl this many number of overs every game, this is probably the last thing Australia would have wanted going into such an important game, it would be a huge blow to the already fragile Aussie top-order if he doesn't play.
Here's a revolutionary idea - pick 4 bowlers and an all-rounderThough that seems to have come at some cost, Clarke is now in doubt for the series decider.
Given Clarke history of back problems, he shouldn't have been made to bowl this many number of overs every game, this is probably the last thing Australia would have wanted going into such an important game, it would be a huge blow to the already fragile Aussie top-order if he doesn't play.
Who is going to bowl though?Would be the natural replacement, would it not?
Wouldn't mind Davey batting down the order; really only converted to opening the past year or two. He's a very good player of spin, and if set could be super during the death overs or batting powerplay.