TheJediBrah
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Importance of having a player like Steve Smith, might not have looked like much at the time but looking back that was a crucial knock
And the 2011 team (also truly awful although the nucleus of the great side to follow) actually pinched a test match.It’s just bizarre to think that NZ’s greatest ever side is now looking odds on to never win a game in Australia, when some truly awful teams (like any 90’s Nz side) usually managed to pinch at least one.
Zimbabwe managed to steal a win against the same side NZ's best odi side can't get close to beating. Just odd all around.It’s just bizarre to think that NZ’s greatest ever ODI side is now looking odds on to never win a game in Australia, when some truly awful teams (like any 90’s Nz side) usually managed to pinch at least one.
It was a good innings but he still got out with just 117 on the board. Kind of bewildering how the match progressed from thereImportance of having a player like Steve Smith, might not have looked like much at the time but looking back that was a crucial knock
I'll hazard a guess at conservative. Just a hunchIf they underperform at least we've got alternative players to pressure their spots - Allen, Phillips, Nicholls, Young, Chapman etc. Will the selectors be brave or conservative?
I remember he got a 70 he got against Australia batting quite high (4 or 5?)To be frank, apart from an important couple of overs with the bat against England in the WC final, he hasn't really played a substantial innings against top sides. Bashing Thisara Perera does not count.
His willingness to hit selflessly when the situation demands it is good, but sometimes like today we need a bigger innings and he doesn't provide that.
Bowling can be deceptively good but overall his batting hasn't delivered enough.
Edit: forgot important 97* in the World Cup v Pakistan. So that's one.
Yeah did feel as if a switch was flicked then, but seeing NZ of late actually wasn’t that much of a surprise - they just seem rather clueless outside their comfort zones atm. Doesn’t help that Kane is in some weird ongoing safety-first phase as both captain and batsman.It was a good innings but he still got out with just 117 on the board. Kind of bewildering how the match progressed from there
Tempted to keep Guptill, move Conway to 4 and keeping and rest Latham (poor against good pace attacks).Yep. Guptill, Macewell and Southee out, Allen, Phillips and Sears in. Ferguson too, though not sure who for
TBF these are the kinds of wickets Latham is useful on, as we saw in the first game. Though you’d never know he’s been a test opener for 8 years from his dismissal today.Tempted to keep Guptill, move Conway to 4 and keeping and rest Latham (poor against good pace attacks).
An example that immediately came to mind for me:It’s just bizarre to think that NZ’s greatest ever ODI side is now looking odds on to never win a game in Australia, when some truly awful teams (like any 90’s Nz side) usually managed to pinch at least one.
The late 90s NZ side was pretty good actually. Mid 90s was obviously terrible and rife with division, but once the Crowe/Rutherford shambles sorted itself out (one retired, the other bailed to SA) Fleming lead a good side with match-winners in it.An example that immediately came to mind for me:
New Zealand beat Australia, New Zealand won by 4 wickets (with 5 balls remaining)
NZ 251/4 vs AUS 253/6 - New Zealand won by 4 wickets (with 5 balls remaining) in Melbourne, Carlton & United Series 1997, January 21, 1998www.espncricinfo.com
13 overs bowled by Astle/McMillan!
Nonetheless an even worse team beat Aus in an ODI over there in 1993/94 (and drew a test series 1-1 with them in NZ in 92/93).The late 90s NZ side was pretty good actually. Mid 90s was obviously terrible and rife with division, but once the Crowe/Rutherford shambles sorted itself out (one retired, the other bailed to SA) Fleming lead a good side with match-winners in it.
1.WarnerNonetheless an even worse team beat Aus in an ODI over there in 1993/94 (and drew a test series 1-1 with them in NZ in 92/93).
I can't paste the scorecard successfully on my phone but this team (Bryan Young, Rod Latham, Andrew Jones, Ken Rutherford, Mark Greatbatch, Shane Thomson, Chris Cairns, Tony Blain, Gavin Larsen, Chris Pringle, Richard De Groen) beat this one (Mark Taylor, David Boon, Dean Jones, Mark Waugh, Damian Martyn, Allan Border, Ian Healy, Paul Reiffel, Shane Warne, Tim May, Glenn McGrath).
How many of that NZ team would make this current NZ team? Probably just 3 of them - (Jones, Cairns, and Larsen) whereas 6 or 7 of that Aussie team would make their current side.
Wait what? We beat Australia 30% of the time in ODI's? Not as bad as I'd have thought given the way we choke to death against them.With a win percentage of 30 against the Aussies since 1974, I wonder why the Kiwis are sent to play against Australia every year. How many times can you see the same clueless lambs being slaughtered? On mercy grounds, there should be no Kiwi vs Oz series until Kiwis build up a team actually capable of challenging the Aussies.
Generally had the better of Aus in white ball matches at home in the last decade and a half, so that helps the overall percentage look better.Wait what? We beat Australia 30% of the time in ODI's? Not as bad as I'd have thought given the way we choke to death against them.