Pratters
Cricket, Lovely Cricket
I havent discredited Peiterson! Ofcourse it was largely due to the Pieterson effort.Adamc said:He's just making the point that, if it wasn't for Pietersen's individual effort, Australia most likely would've won. Feel free to dispute that. England as a team outplayed Australia as well, but it was Pietersen who secured the win.
But when its said,
From an Australian point of view said:Its like saying Australia played well and its only cos of a knock out of the blue from Pieterson.
As you said, over all England played better than Australia which is the thing the emphasis should be on and not just the brilliant Pieterson inning being the cause of the result. There was that good catch by Collingwood, the wonderful spell by Harmison, more sensible captaincy.
From an Australian perspective I wont say they didnt play all that badly which the guy seems to be pointing. The batting collapse in the beginning, the poor captaincy and the bowling alternatives and discipline are things to concentrate on more than any thing.