Aren't you lucky!Jono said:May possibly fly up to watch a match or two, considering I may be visiting my dad in Singapore at the same time.
If Jason Gillespie can score a double century then anything can/could happen...TT Boy said:Well if someone used the word "shotgun batsman" then yes it is a bit OTT. Though I would not be surprised if Brett Lee tons up in a test match, something Symonds will never achieve.
Don said:umm isnt this a three team series?
I think they would make the finals ahead of India. And may even win it. If the wickets happen to be a slightly slow, Samuels/Gayle will make life very difficult for the usually free stroking Indian and Aussie batsman, AFAIC. Their 20 overs for 80-100 runs and 2-3 wickets could be a telling difference.Don said:so its a forgone conclusion that WI arent going make a peep in this tourney
Great to see you back (if solely for this post) pal.ClownSymonds said:I got tickets to the matches on the 16th and 18th - Australia vs. India and Australia vs. West Indies. Should be good. I'll get to see Clown himself smash a couple centuries and take maybe 10 or 12 wickets.
Yea hopefully Haddin makes some good runs since his keeping has always been impressive. It will be interesting to see whether he opens or bats down the other.AussieDominance said:gilchrist missing the series is disappointing but an oppurtunity for Haddin
It would make sense to bat him down the order as they've already picked three batsmen capable of opening in Hayden, Katich and Jaques.aussie said:Yea hopefully Haddin makes some good runs since his keeping has always been impressive. It will be interesting to see whether he opens or bats down the other.
Thank you, sir. I've found myself a bit busy lately (partially because I got smashed by a truck and had open-heart surgery and was actually dead at one point), but now I should be able to post some.TT Boy said:Great to see you back (if solely for this post) pal.
Sorry to hear mate.ClownSymonds said:Thank you, sir. I've found myself a bit busy lately (partially because I got smashed by a truck and had open-heart surgery and was actually dead at one point), but now I should be able to post some.
Thank you.Mister Wright said:Sorry to hear mate.
Glad to hear all is well.
ClownSymonds said:Thank you, sir. I've found myself a bit busy lately (partially because I got smashed by a truck and had open-heart surgery and was actually dead at one point), but now I should be able to post some.
I don't see Australia losing this series. For one, Cricket Australia is supposedly in charge of pitch preparation, so it's basically a home series. Also, Pidgeon is back and the team is at full strength minus Gilly. West Indies aren't much of a threat, and India never settle because Coach Greg feels it necessary to change their line-up every innings. Assuming it comes to an Australia vs. India final, remember WC 2003.
Yeah yeah, and Bangladesh bowled India out for just over 200 to win a year earlier. The Aussie defeat was due entirely to the fact that Australia assumed it would be much simpler to bowl Bangladesh out, not accounting for Ashraful's miracle innings. Australia also forgot that they didn't have their main strike bowler and probably the best in the world, Brett Lee, in the attack. There will be no underestimation against two quality international sides, India and West Indies, and there will be a full compliment of bowlers and batsmen (minus Gilly) this time.Nishant said:remember aussies v bangladesh?? If bangladesh can beat the aussies, so can india and the west indies.