I guess it's not about being incapable but about no having the ability to do that on a consistent basis, for e.g. Sehwag or Dhoni, who not only has a higher strike rate but also has scored more runs
the opposite would be the case in tests, where someone like Dravid wins hands down but that does not imply that a Dhoni or a Sehwag is incapable for playing tests
It's about being 'more' suitable to a format
Have a look at tonight's matches - completely dominated by test players including 3 (Warne, Sehwag and Dravid) who are supposedly unsuited to the format
This is not just a one-off occurence as virtually every game has been dominated by a test player
Why?
Because they are by faaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaar the most talented cricketers and the best option NO MATTER WHAT THE FORMAT
Dravid and Kallis are 2 of the greatest players in history and can adapt to any form of the game when in form.
The fact is, for one reason or another, they havent been in great touch.
I, for one, found it amusing to see Dravid depositing 20/20 specialists onto the roof tonight.
As we all know, it would be exactly the same results in fc or tests against these guys (if a miracle happened and they actually got picked) because he, and the other test players, are light years in front of them.
The big difference is that in 20/20, Dravid and co have to hit from the outset and, as such, some of the substandard guys get lucky from time to time