chipmonk said:Pakistan bringing Sami is a big mistake IMO
He's certainly better than Farhat who seems to have no foot movement.Mecnun said:.. I rate him and Farhat about the same. Decent FC players but not internationa standard howevr I believe he did well against NZ in Pak.
Another man I regard highly is Imran Nazir. He looked so solid when we saw him, and he did have a good ODI tour of Australia the previous time Pakistan went there for 3 ODI's.vandemataram said:He's certainly better than Farhat who seems to have no foot movement.
He hasn't been impressive lately but then again he performed better than Butt in the fisrt match so Pak were left with no choice than to have Afridi in , in place of Butt.
I think Butt should be given more chance though.
I don't remember any cricketer in the world opting out of a match for a more deserving candidate, if i'm wrong please correct me on it.shoot_me said:By the way, what the hell is Ganguly in the team for? Two of the fours he hit in his innings of 14 were thick edges and I haven't forgotten his 76-ball 22 at Mohali. If this man has any dignity left in him, he will drop himself for Yuvraj.
Cricket is a funny game mate, if Pak loses two quick wkts then 400 might actually look too far.Sehwag309 said:182-2, that 400 doesn't look that Big now
Even if they take a 50 runs lead (though i think they will concede a lead ) they might end up losing the match as i think the wkt will be difficult to bat in fourth innings and Pak batters will struggle against Indian spinners on a cracked pitch.FaaipDeOiad said:Nice to see Pakistan giving a little back to the Indians here. Still hard to see them winning the match, but a contest is nice.
I know, but before that wicket...its seems smallChoora said:Cricket is a funny game mate, if Pak loses two quick wkts then 400 might actually look too far.