-
Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
**Official** India v Pakistan
- Thread starter dudeurfriend
- Start date
Beleg
International Regular
Inzamam semi-blocked the the penultimate ball and the one before that when a single was needed from three balls.
What is weirder is that Tendulkar had more than fielders on the boundry line even when a single was needed.
This wouldn't have changed if Dravid hadn't hurried forwards to him and held a pretty long team conference apparantly convincing tendulkar of the need of placing all the feilders inside the RING!
What is weirder is that Tendulkar had more than fielders on the boundry line even when a single was needed.
This wouldn't have changed if Dravid hadn't hurried forwards to him and held a pretty long team conference apparantly convincing tendulkar of the need of placing all the feilders inside the RING!
Tony Blade
U19 Cricketer
Inzy just drove it to the mid-off fielder on the second last ball, got a sinlge off the last ball.. (past point I think??)
Adamc
Cricketer Of The Year
Oh, phew. You nearly gave me a heart attack then, and i'm not even Pakistani! Amazing match, sets up the series perfectly now. No doubt Tendulkar will be blamed for this loss as well, for failing to defend the three runs off the last over.Beleg said:
Never mind the century and the wicket...SA LittleMaster
Cricket Spectator
1 run needed from 1 ball, india should pull it off to bowl a dot ball
Tony Blade
U19 Cricketer
Dont think you can have more than a certain amount of fiielders inside the ring?
FaaipDeOiad
Hall of Fame Member
Amazing finish. Inzy does the job in the end, but it probably shouldn't have been that hard. 3 off the last over isn't a difficult task for a top order batsman who is set at the crease facing a part-timer.
On the contrary, he couldhave stopped Pak from winningAdamc said:Oh, phew. You nearly gave me a heart attack then, and i'm not even Pakistani! Amazing match, sets up the series perfectly now. No doubt Tendulkar will be blamed for this loss as well, for failing to defend the three runs off the last over.
He had Indian and Pak B**ls in his hands
Sachin wanted diff field
Scaly piscine
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Hmm there seems to be a strange lull in the Ganguly bashing - especially considering that he scored a barnstorming 18 off 33 balls when both teams scored over a run a ball. Fielders on the boundary when 1 run is needed ?!? Madness.
FaaipDeOiad
Hall of Fame Member
As far as I am aware, there is no restriction on that. The restriction is on having players outside the ring.Tony Blade said:
Besides, if you wanted to cut off the singles and there IS a restriction, you could just put players one pace outside the circle and do the same job. The idea of having a restriction on the number outside is to increase the chance of boundaries, I don't think a restriction on the number inside would do anything at all except discourage attacking fields, which would be a terrible idea.
masterblaster
International Captain
He's seriously losing the plot he is. Good to see Sachin back to his belligerent best. Sourav on the other hand has too much on his plate.Scaly piscine said:
Congratulations to Pakistan though, well deserved victory. Another innings for Sachin where he didnt 'win the match' for India, but you know you cant blame him for that. Our bowlers were terrible (as usual).
Im now finding out why Sachin, despite his awesome batting efforts doesnt win any matches for India. It's because our bowlers are so damn pathetic.