Who said they're done with him? I assumed it was rotation of the all-rounders this series.Did the job required, now the finishers need to finish.
It's weird what they've done with De GRandhomme - was the leading lower order batsman (despite not being amaaazing) a few months ago, he's barely played since then and now with Neesham, Nicholls and Bracewell all scoring a bit (though question marks remain on all three), and CDG is on the outer. He was rubbish last match but shouldn't be condemned for that without a few more chances.
I thought it was strange that they left him out for the first game after he'd taken the SL series off.Who said they're done with him? I assumed it was rotation of the all-rounders this series.
Yeah I don't understand this either. Assuming Neesham is set to return for the last 2 games just funny that he gets 1 in 3 after sitting out the SL series.Did the job required, now the finishers need to finish.
It's weird what they've done with De Grandhomme - was the leading lower order batsman (despite not being amaaazing) a few months ago, he's barely played since then and now with Neesham, Nicholls and Bracewell all scoring a bit (though question marks remain on all three), CDG is on the outer. He was rubbish last match but shouldn't be condemned for that without a few more chances.
Should be batting at 8.Santner 28 @ 92, but he's not good enough to bat @ seven for NZ?
Be prepared to be chasing 330+ every game then....Should be batting at 8.
I don't understand your logic?Be prepared to be chasing 330+ every game then....