Yeah, exactly this.If you didn't know who the England players were and watched this partnership, you'd never guess Woakes was the bowler. Has looked much straighter and more controlled.
A mod/admin sticking up for someone that called me a tosser. Don't try to claim I started an argument either. I called his logic dumb, I didn't call him dumb. Must be your mate, well he talks out his backside about Burns that's for sure.Try not being a colossal arsehole.
It helps.
Yawn, picking fights all over the place. Soon be gone I hope and give us all a break.A mod/admin sticking up for someone that called me a tosser. Don't try to claim I started an argument either. I called his logic dumb, I didn't call him dumb. Must be your mate, well he talks out his backside about Burns that's for sure.
Woakes is superior to Stokes in England. The career stats favour Woakes heavily.Well played Woakes. So what happens if Stokes comes back for 3rd test.
He's the next in line tho tbf, whether you like it or not he's the next lad in line.Stop arguing about Rory ****ing Burns
I commented your logic was dumb. It was. Why are you even denying it? You said in your post you were writing Burns off based on one match. That's dumb. I'm not trying to offend you, I'm saying it as it is. It's really dumb logic. You can't write any player on one game. Then you tried to backtrack ridiculously instead of being a man about it.Yawn, picking fights all over the place. Soon be gone I hope and give us all a break.