*Official* India Tour of England 2018

[fredfertang]

I shall have to remember this one, England seem to bat much better when I take a siesta

 

[Pratters]

Pandya is not a test cricketer, at least not yet.

Also, in seaming conditions, you need three pacers. So we missed a beat by not selecting Umesh.

 

[Borges]

There is a bit of turn for the spinners now.

 

[Pratters]

Ideally they should have played an extra batsman for Pandya and retained Yadav.

 

[vcs]

Bowling better after tea.

 

[R!TTER]

Ideally they should have played an extra batsman for Pandya and retained Yadav.

Pandya shouldn't have featured in the last test either, but the lust for another Dev makes the TM[SUP]TM [/SUP]do stupid things!

 

[91Jmay]

Ashwin so good in that over. So many variations with barely anything changing.

 

[LegionOfBrad]

Just a case of the rain saving India now. 250+ lead in the offing.

 

[R!TTER]

Just a case of the rain saving India now. 250+ lead in the offing.

Can we order cloud seeding in the middle of London?

 

[cnerd123]

Kohli has bowled Shami into the ground today. Hope he doesn't break down.

 

[Jack1]

Not just one game tosser, but I don't rate Burns. If we select him I will get behind him but don't try to tell me what I am thinking mr misery.

You said based on one game sunshine. Don't act a big man now. You don't rate Burns yet he outscores every other English opener by country miles in CC1. You sound like a moron. Don't say you don't rate him in tests either, he hasn't played one. If you don't rate him in FC cricket you're thick. He scores more runs than anyone else and the stats show it as fact on his career (apart from Cook) and this season. You only find out if someone is good enough for tests by picking him. Naturally he's the best option as he's the strongest FC opening option England have by a distance.

If you are thinking different then don't claim that you aren't picking Burns based off of one game. You are blatantly backtracking now as you realised how dumb it is to judge a player based on one game.

I'm relaxed actually, unlike you. Don't say something if you don't have the balls to stick to it. You are gutless.

 

[91Jmay]

Kohli has bowled Shami into the ground today. Hope he doesn't break down.

Ashwin's workload seriously puzzling. Same workload as Pandya and 9 less overs than Shami.

 

[OverratedSanity]

Shami deserves more reward... been pretty unlucky. The rest of the attack has looked pretty meh.

 

[91Jmay]

Woakes is the Lords ATG all rounder.

 

[artvandalay]

Pandya needs more time in domestic cricket before he plays test. Cricket or india. He isnt great at anything at this current level . The one selection that would have made a difference here was bhuvis.

 

[OverratedSanity]

Pandya needs more time in domestic cricket before he plays test. Cricket or india. He isnt great at anything at this current level . The one selection that would have made a difference here was bhuvis.

Playing him in the ODIs might have been one of the dumbest selection calls ever.

 

[Jack1]

Woakes averaging 47.63 bat and 23.16 ball at home as it stands.

 

[91Jmay]

Playing him in the ODIs might have been one of the dumbest selection calls ever.

Saddest thing is that he isn't even good at ODIs

 

[flibbertyjibber]

You said based on one game sunshine. Don't act a big man now. You don't rate Burns yet he outscores every other English opener by country miles in CC1. You sound like a moron. Don't say you don't rate him in tests either, he hasn't played one. If you don't rate him in FC cricket you're thick. He scores more runs than anyone else and the stats show it as fact on his career (apart from Cook) and this season. You only find out if someone is good enough for tests by picking him. Naturally he's the best option as he's the strongest FC opening option England have by a distance.

If you are thinking different then don't claim that you aren't picking Burns based off of one game. You are blatantly backtracking now as you realised how dumb it is to judge a player based on one game.

I'm relaxed actually, unlike you. Don't say something if you don't have the balls to stick to it. You are gutless.

One thing I am not is gutless you daft ****.

You only ever try to start fights with every post you ever make you miserable sod. I don't rate Burns, end of. He may have scored runs but so did Stoneman and Jennings before they failed. Burns will too. Just my opinion, hope i am wrong but I don't think I am.

 

[AndyZaltzHair]

You said based on one game sunshine. Don't act a big man now. You don't rate Burns yet he outscores every other English opener by country miles in CC1. You sound like a moron. Don't say you don't rate him in tests either, he hasn't played one. If you don't rate him in FC cricket you're thick. He scores more runs than anyone else and the stats show it as fact on his career (apart from Cook) and this season. You only find out if someone is good enough for tests by picking him. Naturally he's the best option as he's the strongest FC opening option England have by a distance.

If you are thinking different then don't claim that you aren't picking Burns based off of one game. You are blatantly backtracking now as you realised how dumb it is to judge a player based on one game.

I'm relaxed actually, unlike you. Don't say something if you don't have the balls to stick to it. You are gutless.

Classy post over a selection