Senile Sentry
International Debutant
Normal service restored after a blip.
Still third seamer option is turd for India. Need to fix it.
Still third seamer option is turd for India. Need to fix it.
bumrah for wc.Normal service restored after a blip.
Still third seamer option is turd for India. Need to fix it.
Wait. What?That would certainly help, yeah. Tendulkar always went up a level in WCs.
Padded his stats vs minnows and then went missing in the finals.Wait. What?
argues that the sample size of lillee in asia is too smallWait. What?
Replace Tendulkar with Bradman and that statement would be true about Bradman's entire career.Padded his stats vs minnows and then went missing in the finals.
Hate to break it to you but Bradman played most of his intl cricket against very strong England teams.Replace Tendulkar with Bradman and that statement would be true about Bradman's entire career.
Hate to break it to you but most of runs scored by Tendulkar in WC were against bowling attacks that were very good . I am pretty sure now you will also say that England's attack during Bradman's time had bowlers like Akram, Waqar, Shoaib , Murali etc.Hate to break it to you but Bradman played most of his intl cricket against very strong England teams.
I apologise to you for bringing Bradman in this debate . Call it peace. Bradman >> TendulkarI'm not the one saying Sachin padded his stats. I love SRT.
England's attack during Bradman's day featured players such as Larwood, Bowes, Voce, Verity, Tate & Laker. All of which were very, very good.
Wait. What?argues that the sample size of lillee in asia is too small
uses 0.43% of a player's games to discredit him
wp
For what it's worth, I feel that had Sachin played during the same era he would have averaged pretty close to 99 as well. Both him & Braddles are two of the most technically correct batsmen of all time.I apologise to you for bringing Bradman in this debate . Call it peace. Bradman >> Tendulkar
very doubtfulFor what it's worth, I feel that had Sachin played during the same era he would have averaged pretty close to 99 as well.
Bradman was not special to Aussie crowd because of his average, his attacking game drew crowds to the ground. I read an article by David Frith where he said that in those days nobody knew Bradman's average, there was an aura about him I believe.Bradman's 99 average wasn't just because of his technique. There have been tons of great technicians who haven't averaged close to that. The man had a mind of steel. Most great batsmen have lapses in concentration at some point or another. Bradman almost never did. That's why he holds all the records for innings per century, doubles and triples. Once he got in he was literally impossible to remove.
I don't think Sachin would average 99 if he played in that era. He'd probably average just as much.
It's such a weird thing to think. To think that Sachin would have averaged what Bradman did you'd have to think that:I don't think Sachin would average 99 if he played in that era. He'd probably average just as much.
No. of matches played by Sachin in world cup finals - 2Wait. What?