• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* India Tour of Australia 2018/19

stephen

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Yep India outplayed Australia in every department - batting, bowling and in the field. Deserved winners.

And nothing can take that away from them and it's a win to savor. Wins against traditionally strong opposition in their backyard don't come along every day.

I've calmed down a bit after ranting about everything on Friday. I still think a reckoning needs to happen but I'm convinced more than ever that we need a new set of selectors who pick based on a combination of performance and technique.

Handscomb has the domestic runs on the board but his technique is poor (mostly when standing back in his crease) and so he should be on a tighter leash than others.

I've been calling for Burns recall for a while but I still think long term Renshaw will be the test batsman we base our game around.

Sadly this series is another reminder of how badly Australian cricket misses Phil Hughes.
 

Kilowatt

School Boy/Girl Captain
I still think that both teams were evenly matched and India would likely have lost this Test series if Smith and Warner were playing. OTOH If your batting got so weakened by not having just 2 players (out of 7), maybe it wasn't that good to begin with. In the absence of Pujara and Kohli, an Indian home team would look thus

Dhawan
Shaw
Gill/Agrawal/Rahul
Rohit (averages 70+ in Ranji and 80+ in home Tests)
Rahane
Pant
Jadeja
Ashwin
Kuldeep
Umesh
Shami

This team will easily smash any full strength Australian team as well as any wannabe No.1 team.
 

Daemon

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Cheers for the headache ishqi whatever, starfighter, burgey and bambino

annoying how winning always comes with a few blow ins

starfighter and bambino y'all gotta learn to stop biting

---

Really pleased with the series win, but honestly it doesn't feel that amazing because of Smith and Warner's absence. Kinda like if we were to go to the UAE and drub Pakistan. Cool but would've been nicer if we did it when Misbah and Younis were around.

Far more happy with our pace attack bowling better than Australia's. Bit hard to explain, the wins just didn't make me feel that happy. I recall feeling happier in '14 when we went 1-0 up after Rahane tonned up and Ishant bounced England out.
 

OverratedSanity

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Cheers for the headache ishqi whatever, starfighter, burgey and bambino

annoying how winning always comes with a few blow ins

starfighter and bambino y'all gotta learn to stop biting

---

Really pleased with the series win, but honestly it doesn't feel that amazing because of Smith and Warner's absence. Kinda like if we were to go to the UAE and drub Pakistan. Cool but would've been nicer if we did it when Misbah and Younis were around.

Far more happy with our pace attack bowling better than Australia's. Bit hard to explain, the wins just didn't make me feel that happy. I recall feeling happier in '14 when we went 1-0 up after Rahane tonned up and Ishant bounced England out.
This is because you haven't experienced the pain of enough overseas disappointments. Granted, you watched 0-8 but the 90s very gloomy as ****.
 

Victor Ian

International Coach
Grats India. Grats pinata and bumbag. The best thing about this series for me with my crap memory is I will have forgotten about it by next week.
 

Borges

International Regular
tbh I think Cummins series bowling has been overrated a bit. He was great in Melbourne but I think he was no more than solid in the first two Tests as I think he got into the habit of pitching it short of a length or bounces too often which gets the crowd and comes excited but doesn't lead to wickets that often, as his stars showed.
Yes.

In this series and in the recent past, Australian bowling has looked good when Lyon has bowled well.
In the last two tests of this series, Lyon was off colour, and it reflected in the effectiveness of Australian bowling as a whole.
 

vcs

Request Your Custom Title Now!
This is because you haven't experienced the pain of enough overseas disappointments. Granted, you watched 0-8 but the 90s very gloomy as ****.
In the '90s we barely got invited to tour, especially outside Asia, because no one rated us (rightly so). And also we seemed to have a weird fetish with random ODI tri-series.

0-8 was terrible. The lowest moment of Indian cricket in my lifetime probably was the matchfixing scandal though. That's why the win over Australia in 2001 will never ever be topped.
 

OverratedSanity

Request Your Custom Title Now!
In the '90s we barely got invited to tour, especially outside Asia, because no one rated us (rightly so). And also we seemed to have a weird fetish with random ODI tri-series.
.
That stretch from 97 or so to 2000 was ****ing dreadful. Got demolished everywhere away, even against a pretty average England team, the collapse in WI chasing 120, Chennai/Kolkata 99 vs Pakistan , getting blanked 0-3 in Aus, then getting smacked by SA at home, before the matchfixing stuff came out... dark times.

The only golden moment in tests was Sachin owning Warne in 98.
 

Daemon

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Honestly 0-8, Jo'burg, Wellington, Curran, AB and dropping Bhuvi have all been incredibly traumatic experiences. If Pujara didn't show up this time we probably would've been in for another round of heartbreaks.
 

vcs

Request Your Custom Title Now!
That Pujara-Kohli partnership in Jo'burg was glorious though. One of my favourite days of Test cricket.

The 2014 disappointments were much easier to stomach compared to 0-8 because it was growing pains with a young team and they didn't really lack fight, most of the time.
 

sunilz

International Regular
The biggest disappointment in this overseas cycle have been Rahane and Ashwin . Both of them didn't have even 1 meaningful contribution in 12 test matches ( 50s and 2 or 3 wkts don't count )
 

OverratedSanity

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Meh, they've both had significant contributions (Rahane at Joburg, Trentbridge and Adelaide and Ashwin in the 1st Test in England and a highly underrated performance at adelaide).

Not good enough overall id agree but they've definitely contributed.
 

sunilz

International Regular
Meh, they've both had significant contributions (Rahane at Joburg, Trentbridge and Adelaide and Ashwin in the 1st Test in England and a highly underrated performance at adelaide).

Not good enough overall id agree but they've definitely contributed.
They were senior players . Even Vihari and Kuldeep yadav who were on their first tour have performed better than them
 

Niall

International Coach
That Pujara-Kohli partnership in Jo'burg was glorious though. One of my favourite days of Test cricket.

The 2014 disappointments were much easier to stomach compared to 0-8 because it was growing pains with a young team and they didn't really lack fight, most of the time.
I think in 2014 regarding South Africa, the only genuine LOL selection was Rohit? I need to check obviously though.:ph34r:
 

weldone

Hall of Fame Member
A. THE SERIOUSNESS:

As someone whose hobby is to dabble and swim tirelessly in the ocean of cricket statistics, one simple stat always made me feel ashamed: total number of test series India had won in Australia and South Africa in history = 0. World Cup win is undoubtedly the ‘biggest’ achievement in cricket. But over the years, I have realised a test series win for a subcontinental team in these two places to be perhaps a touch tougher.

B. THE TWO COLOURS:

Flashback to nine months ago: IPL 2018 started in the month of April in India. That’s the time when cricket players became more expensive in India along with onions and petrol, and the middle-class partly bored with their routine lives threw the dust off their coloured sunglasses preparing to watch cheerleaders gyrate to mishits going for DLF maximums sponsored by Paytm. At the same time, there was a different kind of colour in the quiet country-sides of Yorkshire. Flowers were starting to bloom; fields were starting to get greener again after the long depressing winter; Nature was unfurling its glories after hibernation – slowly but surely summer was coming. Murmurs were heard mostly among old people in the beautiful quiet valley – an internationally acclaimed batsman was rumoured to be coming to play County cricket for Yorkshire. He had arguably been the best player of spin in world cricket since the retirement of Younis Khan; but his record outside subcontinent had indicated that he lacked the skill and technique to succeed in alien conditions just like some of his predecessors Vengsarkar, Jayawardene and Zaheer Abbas. Experts generally agreed that he belonged in the above category rather than the subcontinent giants who conquered all conditions (Tendulkar, Gavaskar, Sangakkara, Dravid, Miandad, Kohli). But the man was not giving it up without a fight.

C. THE INVISIBLE WHIP:

It’s not important that he failed over the next three months and couldn’t score even one half-century in 12 innings, but that he failed in spectacular misery! He knew shortcuts to failure are only for the lazy and the faint-hearted. So he employed his bat, his brain, body, concentration and sacrificed his reputation to humble grinds like 7(42) and 6(28) against Somerset, 2(15) against Nottinghamshire, 32(109) and 0(11) against Hampshire and 23(111) against Surrey before being completely outclassed by County bowlers! He seemed to have access to an invisible painful whip that can only be constantly lashed at himself till he rectified his life-long technical flaws, but without any trickery – in that failure of a County stint there were zero shots played in frustration, no shots executed in desperation. Much later when he summarised his philosophy after the Adelaide century, any casual cricket-lover found it hard to believe this to be the advice from a successful person in the 21st century: “It is easy to play shots. When you start playing shots [during a testing spell], that means your game is not capable enough to play the test format. You are trying to survive rather than understand the situation and play accordingly. When you start playing shots, it means you are under pressure as a batsman and you are not able to handle that situation. When you defend confidently you know you are in command. You are on top of the bowler, and he doesn’t have a chance to get you out.” Nobody fully appreciated his methods during those failures (including a heart-broken well-wisher like me, I confess) and he was dropped from the first test in England. Today, that drop is as relevant as a CEAT Tyres Strategic Timeout.

D. HAMMOND-ESQUE:

Most people would say that the series win down-under sounds a bigger achievement than it actually was this time – and they would be absolutely right in saying so. After all, what Australian cricket went through in the last year is no secret – and any team without its two best batsmen stands crippled. Indian bowlers certainly had it easy this time. But that made zilch difference to Indian batsmen who still had to face Australian bowling in its full might. Don’t fool yourself into believing that Starc-Haze-Cummins-Lyon isn’t the best bowling attack Australia has put up ever since the retirements of McGrath and Warne. The only reason they looked slightly off-colour in Sydney is because they were tired after India’s no. 3 kept them on the field for days before that in Adelaide and Melbourne. The fact that the remaining 10 batsmen combined to score only 2 hundreds in the whole series in addition to his 3 is a validation. In fact, if weather allowed India to complete their third win of the series in Sydney then it would only be the second time in Australia’s 142 years-long test cricketing history that a visiting batsman would score 3 centuries in 3 different matches in the same series all for winning causes! The great Wally Hammond did it in the 1928/29 series – but even Hammond’s biggest fan won’t say that particular Australian attack had any good fast/fast-medium bowlers.

E. THE LIMELIGHT:

This colossal success of India's first-down batsman in Australia and also in the England test series before that is a lesson for hundreds of young talented batsmen in India. You don’t need to be a pompous abusive tattooed gym-conquering celebrity to become as successful a test cricketer as Kohli – there is also another way, the ChePu way: sweat it out in the middle for hours and days and months and years when nobody is watching. Today after the historic series is won, everybody will come to hog the limelight and media attention. The clueless Coach will explain how this time the score-line is a correct reflection of how the sides played unlike in the England and South Africa series, and how this series win means all the tactical decisions since he took over have been proven correct. You’ll hear soundbites from BCCI and maybe even some politicians eager to take credit. Other cricketers will get busy preparing for the upcoming tight limited-overs schedule followed by IPL. But Cheteshwar Pujara, our dark knight, will go back to toil it out again in Ranji Trophy and County Cricket as far from limelight as possible – to a place where brand endorsements, IPL contracts and paparazzi can’t disturb his inner peace and sense of triumph.
 

Top