OverratedSanity
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Paine said it in the press conferenceSource?
Even Marsh has more substance than Marnus does.
Paine said it in the press conferenceSource?
Even Marsh has more substance than Marnus does.
Yuck. There's like 10 better options. What exactly did Marnus do in the UAE to suggest he's a real option? Unless o/c they're picking him at 6 instead of Marsh.Paine said it in the press conference
He's replacing Mitch for the part time legspin I'm guessing. Looks like Finch will get another go. Poor guy, would've had a shot at being an average batsmen in the middle order but he'll just get discarded after this.Source?
Even Marsh has more substance than Marnus does.
Yeah tbf if they're picking him as the AR I can see the logic. He can't really be worse than Mitch at this point and his leggies were actually pretty dangerous in the UAE. Still annoying though in that the rest of there's a significantly better option around who can play the same role and a few other bats in domestics who are upgrades on what we've got now (whereas Marnus will just be another guy who can get starts but won't kick on)He's replacing Mitch for the part time legspin I'm guessing. Looks like Finch will get another go. Poor guy, would've had a shot at being an average batsmen in the middle order but he'll just get discarded after this.
Credit to Australia for producing ok pitches this time round. Mitch J wouldn't have retired had he played on these.
Yeah it's poor from the Australian selectors. Picking Labaschagne is woeful. He's done nothing to suggest a recall should be in order. He's a Langer favourite though. And that's all that matters right?He's replacing Mitch for the part time legspin I'm guessing. Looks like Finch will get another go. Poor guy, would've had a shot at being an average batsmen in the middle order but he'll just get discarded after this.
Credit to Australia for producing ok pitches this time round. Mitch J wouldn't have retired had he played on these.
Wade would bring both experience (which Paine said Australia are lacking), form and some decent part time bowling into the side.Marnus? The ****?
Why not Wade (sucks, but he's been piling on too many runs to be ignored, and is heaps better than other pricks)? Or even Maxwell seems like a less worse option in comparison really?
Just swap Cummins and Finch in the batting order imo. :PWade would bring both experience (which Paine said Australia are lacking), form and some decent part time bowling into the side.
Maxwell would improve the fielding, provide a decent part time spin option and would give him a deserved shot at a permanent test spot.
Burns would let Finch move to the middle order.
Can't believe the day where we're hoping Wade to be selected as the "best possible choice". He looks like the best option rn and could replace virtually anyone in the XI really. Should easily be picked, dunno why he isn't?Wade would bring both experience (which Paine said Australia are lacking), form and some decent part time bowling into the side.
Maxwell would improve the fielding, provide a decent part time spin option and would give him a deserved shot at a permanent test spot.
Burns would let Finch move to the middle order.
The thing that sucks the most is that Maxwell is at least as good of a spinner and a much better batsman too, so if you really needed a batting all-rounder who bowled spin, why not him?I think I'd rather have him than Mitch Marsh. The thing I find most annoying about it is the continuation of the urban legend that there exists a Test ground in Australia you should go out of way to get two spinners in for.
Location: ChennaiI like the Labuschagne pick. Hopefully him and Cummins do well at the SCG and we still win, easily.
What recent form? Marnus had a dire Shield iirc?Can only see a Marnus inclusion at the expense of M Marsh. People can imagine wholesale changes with Burns Maxie and Wade and I don’t disagree but since we’re limited to an actual squad the only change I’d make is swapping S Marsh and Finch in the order. There is no place in the order where Marsh looks good so he might as well accomodate Finch in a position where he has excelled in fc cricket.
Mitch Marsh bowled well in Melb. and I’m sceptical Marnus can match his workload. Mind you if that happened we’d be losing the match anyway. In a comparison I think Marnus has more runs in him than M Marsh and a good bet he’d take more wickets too on recent form. So Marnus for Mitch is preferable imo.