81.39 (Lara) > 70Sanz said:Oh and except Gayle, all WI batsmen had the strike rate < 70.
That's the most ridiculous attitude I've heard since the "play 6 specialist bowlers" suggestion Richard made.Arjun said:If the West Indians bowl more wides and no-balls and the Indians win, there's no need to complain, given how many the Indians bowled.
I don't know what game you were watching, but there were an awful lot of dot balls in the last 10-15 overs of the West Indies innings, which is a clear reflection of the LACK of strike rotation. I don't see any basis for criticism of Dravid's captaincy/field placings/India's performance in the closing stages of the innings.Arjun said:Notice how many singles were pinched through the field placings? The way Gayle is batting, he can hit sixes and fours even with the most defensive fields, so they can't lose too much by placing more men around the bat.
Sorry, serves me well for being lazy and depending on Cricbuzz's calc and shouldn't the advice be Learn to calculate' as there was no counting involved.Mr Mxyzptlk said:81.39 (Lara) > 70
76.92 (Samuels) > 70
120 (Baugh) > 70
Learn to count.
Are you converting to the AAAS?!Jono said:YES! AA gets Morton, had $10 on Morton to score less than 42.5 runs.
The man AA gets me a little cash.
Yeah he delivered a quicker one and it did look like a "chuck" (at least the replay).Sanz said:Great 50 by Dravid.
Is there something wrong with Samuels ' action ? CB is reporting that he chucked one particular delivery and might be reported.
And how is Kaif a dissapointment here ? He was the new batsmen in and needed to stay because India were playing with only 5 batsmen and lost 3 quick batsmen, Had India lost another wicket, it would have been tough to recover.adharcric said:Kaif has been a big disappointment once again. He's the type of batsman that operates mainly through singles and doubes ... and he hasn't been able to do that today. Perhaps he's looking to make a good score for once, but I haven't been impressed at all.