Precambrian
Banned
Of course. But Jayawardene has always been a whiner.
he shouldn't be whining as he was lucky to win the test series. the SL win in the test series was more like delivering one more nail [hopefully the final one] to the aged Ind test team's coffinOf course. But Jayawardene has always been a whiner.
Evident that winning the toss and batting first in Sri Lanka during a day-nighter is a huge advantage, mind.after the comprehensive ODI series win in SL, may be if Ind had fielded in-form players in the tests then the result there could have been different
the wins in T20, CB series, Idea Cup and looking at the top 2 teams in the IPL, it evident that it's big form that counts over big names
Ind has won chasing tooEvident that winning the toss and batting first in Sri Lanka during a day-nighter is a huge advantage, mind.
Was Dalmiya even in power when Ganguly was selected back into the team in 2005 ?How did he get back to the team then? You're telling me that was all based on merit?
Ha Ha, double standards exposed!someone is feeling sore after the series loss
double standards, is it some new SL movie? *wondering*Ha Ha, double standards exposed!
Not under lights.Ind has won chasing too
Great! Typical whining. Give credit when due. First it was toss, even though the Lankan captain himself said toss was not a factor, (of course he changed his words after the series was lost). Then you say, not under the lights. Tell me, is it a crime that Dhoni won toss? That's what an intellient cap do, try and convert every opportunity into wins, and Dhoni did exactly that. I doubt whether this point would've been raised had it been Sri lanka who won toss and won.Not under lights.
Toss did matter, but SL should have chased 220. 250 is bit too much on that pitch, but SL did manage to score 200+ on the track, showing 220 is gettable.Great! Typical whining. Give credit when due. First it was toss, even though the Lankan captain himself said toss was not a factor, (of course he changed his words after the series was lost). Then you say, not under the lights. Tell me, is it a crime that Dhoni won toss? That's what an intellient cap do, try and convert every opportunity into wins, and Dhoni did exactly that. I doubt whether this point would've been raised had it been Sri lanka who won toss and won.
hmm, weren't SL playing at home? if you think that toss was a crucial factor then may be SL owes its victories at home to winning tossesNot under lights.
That's a very famous Indian movie involving Indian cricketers.double standards, is it some new SL movie? *wondering*
Pitches has changed a lot, or SL batsmen have become inept, or a combination of both. But SL pitches produce matches similar to ealy and middle 90s type matches where big bullies of batsmen are found wanting with their techniques.hmm, weren't SL playing at home? may be SL owes its victories at home to winning tosses then
The very fact that despite being down 5 down before 25th over for less than 100, Sri Lanka got to 200 shows that there wasn't much in the pitch to moan about. The only thing was Indian new ball bowling was too good for the SL top order. The reason why Sri Lanka got to 200 was because of some Slogging by Thushara aided by a complacent Dhoni who bowled with Yuvi and Rohit, knowing that the match was in the bag. At no point in all the three matches Sri Lanka ever looked dangerous enough of beating India. That is comprehensive.Toss did matter, but SL should have chased 220. 250 is bit too much on that pitch, but SL did manage to score 200+ on the track, showing 220 is gettable.
SL is used to playing on such conditions and it's the visitors who have to adjust, thus it's wouldn't surprise me if many of the SL wins in the past were due to it winning tosses, if it were to be implied that Ind won because it won tosses and that [crediting tosses for Ind wins] takes a lot out of SL wins at homePitches has changed a lot, or SL batsmen have become inept, or a combination of both. But SL pitches produce matches similar to ealy and middle 90s type matches where big bullies of batsmen are found wanting with their techniques.
Sri Lanka really needs to sit and find a solution to win more matches abroad in different conditions. Their captain courageous, who talks of how competitive he was, would do well to check his away average in test matches. It is no wonder that Sri Lanka has hardly had anyone save for Sanga who can bat for 4 hours in say Australia.Pitches has changed a lot, or SL batsmen have become inept, or a combination of both. But SL pitches produce matches similar to ealy and middle 90s type matches where big bullies of batsmen are found wanting with their techniques.
Ah c'mon now admit you got pwned..even in the game we lost how many top-order wickets were the result of batsmen having brain-fart?Everyone i would say except Yuvarj,Dhoni and Kohli maybe..you need to take a good hard look at that batting line-up of yours before making such statements..Fact is Indians were the much better side.Even in the last game,Thilan Thushara,if SL cricket board pay him 100bucks for every boundary he scores off the edges of his bat,he would be a millionaire by now.Some great all-rounder he is!!Pitches has changed a lot, or SL batsmen have become inept, or a combination of both. But SL pitches produce matches similar to ealy and middle 90s type matches where big bullies of batsmen are found wanting with their techniques.