Nnanden said:Not very surprising. The rest of the South Africans have thrown away their wickets trying to up the pace. Kallis` knock may indeed win them the game today, but when the pitch isn`t seamer-friendly he can`t afford to bat like this, and he probably will. He`s like Katich, but he converts his starts.
1) I believe other people would be scoring higher if it wasn`t for Kallis` inability to rotate the strike.Langeveldt said:yeah, tongue of Nel, as usual someone hitting 100+ when the next highest score is 44 is now playing for himself and is selfish etc.. Wonder why I bother looking here tbh
Didn't say I accused him, I'm saying Barry Richards did.Langeveldt said:yeah, tongue of Nel, as usual someone hitting 100+ when the next highest score is 44 is now playing for himself and is selfish etc.. Wonder why I bother looking here tbh
fair enough, but I dont see how an "inability to rotate the strike" = selfish (Barry Richards or whoever)... Sajid Mahmood can't bowl a cricket ball, that doesn't mean he is a bad person, or selfish or not a team man..Nnanden said:1) I believe other people would be scoring higher if it wasn`t for Kallis` inability to rotate the strike.
2) It was a great knock on a tricky pitch, and South Africa should win with their bowling attack.
Richards said something like "He was doing fantastic up until he got to 80, and then he just went into a shell". Basically he accused him of just playing for his century, which caused the other guy to take more chances and the wickets to start falling (i.e they were 3 or four down, and then after he went into a shell, they lost a couple in quick succession).Langeveldt said:fair enough, but I dont see how an "inability to rotate the strike" = selfish (Barry Richards or whoever)... Sajid Mahmood can't bowl a cricket ball, that doesn't mean he is a bad person, or selfish or not a team man..
It could be a management thing, in which case I`m wrong. But it seems that Kallis` aim is to stay there throughout the innings while the other players go the bash. Kallis could be more forceful in trying to find gaps and rotate the strike, but chooses not to. Again, this might be a very good tactic in this match, but I doubt it will work in countless others.Langeveldt said:fair enough, but I dont see how an "inability to rotate the strike" = selfish (Barry Richards or whoever)... Sajid Mahmood can't bowl a cricket ball, that doesn't mean he is a bad person, or selfish or not a team man..
Well he probably realises that if he goes then its goodnight Charlie. You seem to think that the South African batting order is particularly good or on form at the moment, Smith has not scored runs for a long time, Gibbs has lost the plot and was doing nothing but offering catching practice today, Bosman is nothing more than a 90's throwback to the pinch hitter and AB's record in ODI is pretty bad for a player of his quality. Kallis is the only constant presence, he should drop anchor its the only sensible thing to do. Playing shots like he did against the West Indies in the last ODI are not on and he knows it.Nnanden said:It could be a management thing, in which case I`m wrong. But it seems that Kallis` aim is to stay there throughout the innings while the other players go the bash. Kallis could be more forceful in trying to find gaps and rotate the strike, but chooses not to. Again, this might be a very good tactic in this match, but I doubt it will work in countless others.