Auckland obviously.One day he'll learn how to play a big daddy hundred.
Nah the jibes were knee-jerk reaction to some random Indian fans and media who go overboard and rated Kohli as a champion test player already. Anyone who mattered knew he was extremely talented and was the only one of the younger brigade to score away from home. Regarding his average, everyone knows he struggled in his first 3 tests and was then dropped so his "average" is skeweed poorly. His average is an irrelevant stat at such a young age and with so few tests under his belt really. And since when is 41 poor anyway?I see where he's coming form tbf. Kohli is clearly a really good batsman, and has high potential, but he'd definitely been overhyped in test cricket in terms of how people thought of him and his actual output. Mainly because he's such a good ODI player and is major eye candy with willow in hand, both of which are major pet hates for me when it comes to rating a test batsman.
Before today he was averaging in the low 40's, despite the fact he'd played most of his tests at home. Furthermore he'd never really done much at the start of a series bar his Chennai century (his Perth, Adelaide and Nagpur exploits were too little too late) and had played some really poor shots at crucial moments of the tests India lost, such as that infamous full toss as Mumbai.
He's someone who has always sort of been a lock in the side and viewed very highly based on talent, potential and the belief that he'll be a really good test batsman, rather than doing it through big test performances like someone such as Pujara has. I can see why that would gripe some people.
I wonder how being the set batsman will change things on that front. He was playing a great supporting role but that'll have to change a bit now.Rahane has done a great little job at his end hasn't he? Hasn't been bothered one bit so far
Shots like that don't stop him from being a very good test batsmen. They just don't make him a Clarke/Amla/Sanga etc. No one is claiming he is (other than Mark Nicholas for some reason)And shots like that don't help.
And Michael Slater.Shots like that don't stop him from being a very good test batsmen. They just don't make him a Clarke/Amla/Sanga etc. No one is claiming he is (other than Mark Nicholas for some reason)
He may continue in the same vein given the new ball and stumps approachesI wonder how being the set batsman will change things on that front. He was playing a great supporting role but that'll have to change a bit now.
Indeed. I guess it just backs up the "Slats wants to be the next Nicholas" jokes.And Michael Slater.
Slater, who I have a signed and framed photo of above my head.
Worst thing.
*witchcraftKallis got Kohli with mindgames.
Should've been the next Damien Fleming instead. So sad.Indeed. I guess it just backs up the "Slats wants to be the next Nicholas" jokes.